Oxford Handbooks Online 2012
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195377385.013.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mexican Elections, 1910–1994: Voters, Violence, and Veto Power

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During most of the twentieth century, elections in Mexico failed to function as a legitimate process for selecting public officials. Electoral manipulation included the modification of final vote counts (Castañeda , 231–39; de la Madrid , 814–24), the alteration of ballot boxes (Langston , 19–22), the certification of the results by a biased legislature (Lehoucq ), the inflation of voter registration lists (Gillingham ; Molinar ; Preston and Dillon ; Simpser ), and the intimidation of opposition supporters (Craig and Cornelius ). Despite instances of centrally planned electoral manipulation (Carbonell , 83–6; Simpser , 113), many of these practices took place in a decentralized manner: local brokers manipulated the ballot boxes in their own regions in exchange for political favors from winning candidates (Langston )…”
Section: Local Elections In Mexicomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During most of the twentieth century, elections in Mexico failed to function as a legitimate process for selecting public officials. Electoral manipulation included the modification of final vote counts (Castañeda , 231–39; de la Madrid , 814–24), the alteration of ballot boxes (Langston , 19–22), the certification of the results by a biased legislature (Lehoucq ), the inflation of voter registration lists (Gillingham ; Molinar ; Preston and Dillon ; Simpser ), and the intimidation of opposition supporters (Craig and Cornelius ). Despite instances of centrally planned electoral manipulation (Carbonell , 83–6; Simpser , 113), many of these practices took place in a decentralized manner: local brokers manipulated the ballot boxes in their own regions in exchange for political favors from winning candidates (Langston )…”
Section: Local Elections In Mexicomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electoral chicanery was far from uncommon in Mexico before 1988 (Gillingham 2012;Simpser and Hernández Company 2014). These irregularities, however, seldom determined the electoral outcome.…”
Section: The Production Of Altered Talliesmentioning
confidence: 99%