2019
DOI: 10.1017/s0003055419000285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fingerprints of Fraud: Evidence from Mexico’s 1988 Presidential Election

Abstract: This paper investigates the opportunities for non-democratic regimes to rely on fraud by documenting the alteration of vote tallies during the 1988 presidential election in Mexico. In particular, I study how the alteration of vote returns came after an electoral reform that centralized the vote-counting process. Using an original image database of the vote-tally sheets for that election and applying Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to analyze the sheets, I find evidence of blatant alterations in about a thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the most popular response to rising levels of violence in Latin America has been the adoption of iron-fist policies, we suggest that democratic-deepening reforms may provide an effective alternative to mano dura strategies that frequently undermined citizen security, human rights, and the legal order (Calderón et al, 2015;Cruz, 2016;Flores-Macías and Zarkin, 2020;Holland, 2013;Magaloni and Rodriguez, 2020;Phillips, 2015). In addition, the effects of electoral manipulation have been widely studied (Cantú, 2019;Hidalgo and Nichter, 2016;Vicente, 2014), and we complement them by showing that election quality can improve substantive outcomes such as security.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…While the most popular response to rising levels of violence in Latin America has been the adoption of iron-fist policies, we suggest that democratic-deepening reforms may provide an effective alternative to mano dura strategies that frequently undermined citizen security, human rights, and the legal order (Calderón et al, 2015;Cruz, 2016;Flores-Macías and Zarkin, 2020;Holland, 2013;Magaloni and Rodriguez, 2020;Phillips, 2015). In addition, the effects of electoral manipulation have been widely studied (Cantú, 2019;Hidalgo and Nichter, 2016;Vicente, 2014), and we complement them by showing that election quality can improve substantive outcomes such as security.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…And, the call to recount "vote by vote, precinct by precinct" after the 2006 presidential elections in Mexico promoted long-lasting mistrust of the electoral system among a large fraction of the citizenry. 1 Inaccuracies in the vote count, of course, could stem from fraudulent electoral practices (Cantú 2018;Hyde 2007;Myagkov, Ordeshook, and Shakin 2010;Simpser 2013). But even in a clean election, the imperfect nature of the counting process makes it impossible to guarantee the accuracy of the tally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key contribution of this paper is to direct attention to the issue of the quality of vote tallies in "normal" elections-that is, clean, routine elections where votes are counted by people. The existing literature discusses the quality of tallies in two specific contexts: fraudulent elections (Cantú 2018;Hyde 2007;Mebane 2010;Myagkov, Ordeshook, and Shakin 2010) and studies of voting technology (e.g., electronic voting machines) (Alvarez, Katz, and Hill 2009;Alvarez and Hall 2008;Ansolabehere and Reeves 2004). Virtually no attention has been given to the issue of tally quality in the modal case: elections where fraud is not an important issue and votes are counted by hand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…And, the call to recount "vote by vote, precinct by precinct" after the 2006 presidential elections in Mexico promoted long-lasting mistrust of the electoral system among a large fraction of the citizenry. 1 Inaccuracies in the vote count, of course, could stem from fraudulent electoral practices (Cantú 2018;Hyde 2007;Myagkov, Ordeshook, and Shakin 2010;Serra 2012;Simpser 2013). But even in a clean election, the imperfect nature of the counting process makes it impossible to guarantee the accuracy of the tally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%