2016
DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20162015039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metodologias de análise da velocidade de fala: um estudo piloto

Abstract: The inclusion of temporal acoustic measures such as speech rate in phonemes per second and articulation rates with and without disfluencies can be a complementary approach in the evaluation of speech rate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Syllable production rate has been recognized as a sensitive clinical indicator for detecting and diagnosing speech-motor disorders [e.g., dysarthria/anarthria ( Kent et al, 1987 ), apraxia of speech ( Kent and Rosenbek, 1983 ; Ziegler, 2002 ; Aichert and Ziegler, 2004 ; Ogar et al, 2006 ), and stuttering ( Logan and Conture, 1995 ; Arcuri et al, 2009 )], and syllables per minute (spm) has long been considered a precise, yet flexible measure of speech rate/fluency capable of evaluating both the severity of disordered speech in impaired populations and the efficiency (in terms or rate and fluency) of communication in healthy speakers ( Cotton, 1936 ; Kelly and Steer, 1949 ; Grosjean and Deschamps, 1975 ; Costa et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Syllable production rate has been recognized as a sensitive clinical indicator for detecting and diagnosing speech-motor disorders [e.g., dysarthria/anarthria ( Kent et al, 1987 ), apraxia of speech ( Kent and Rosenbek, 1983 ; Ziegler, 2002 ; Aichert and Ziegler, 2004 ; Ogar et al, 2006 ), and stuttering ( Logan and Conture, 1995 ; Arcuri et al, 2009 )], and syllables per minute (spm) has long been considered a precise, yet flexible measure of speech rate/fluency capable of evaluating both the severity of disordered speech in impaired populations and the efficiency (in terms or rate and fluency) of communication in healthy speakers ( Cotton, 1936 ; Kelly and Steer, 1949 ; Grosjean and Deschamps, 1975 ; Costa et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( Ruspantini et al, 2012 ); ∼2.83 syll./sec. ( Costa et al, 2016 ); ∼3.67 syll./sec. ( Robb et al, 2004 ); ∼3.75 syll./sec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding its formal aspects, prosody is composed of parameters phonetically described as intensity, melodic variation, and temporal organization of speech. Intensity refers to the amount of energy present in the vibratory movement, and it is represented by dB (decibel); melodic variation is a recurring measure that characterizes the melodic curve, and is associated with fundamental frequency (F0), which is described as the mean frequency of vocal fold vibration and is represented by Hz (hertz) (2) ; the temporal organization of speech includes pause, elocution time, and total articulation time, and through these measures it is possible to obtain others, such as the rates of speech and reading (2,3) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%