2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methylation-dependent fragment separation: Direct detection of DNA methylation by capillary electrophoresis of PCR products from bisulfite-converted genomic DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A procedure for quantification of methylation of cytosine in genomic DNA was reported (106). First, a treatment with bisulfite selectively deaminated cytosine (to yield thymine) but not 5-methylcytosine; second, the forward strands are amplified by PCR using a fluorescently labeled primer.…”
Section: Applications Nucleic Acid Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A procedure for quantification of methylation of cytosine in genomic DNA was reported (106). First, a treatment with bisulfite selectively deaminated cytosine (to yield thymine) but not 5-methylcytosine; second, the forward strands are amplified by PCR using a fluorescently labeled primer.…”
Section: Applications Nucleic Acid Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heterogeneous methylation of the hMLH1 promoter was identified in samples from many colorectal cancer patients, in which hMLH1 promoter methylation was found to have a significant relationship to the loss of protein expression and to increase with the age of the patient [39]. Several DNA methylation studies of this kind have also been reported by others researchers [40,41].…”
Section: Ce In Genomicsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This difference in migration speed could be due to the variation in the base composition of Met and nonMet alleles or to the degradative effect of sodium bisulfite on DNA. Reports on differential migration of Met and nonMet DNA on sodium bisulfite treatment are available in this context (Zhou et al, 2004;Boyd et al, 2006). (b) In the current study, 28 (39.29%) was the most common CGG repeat observed followed by 27 (24.04%).…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…(d) There appears to be a considerable level of allele dropout using the rPCR method, that is, the preferential amplification of only one allele (normal), dropping out the larger/expanded allele from amplification. (e) As Boyd et al (2006) pointed; it would not be easy to apply a correction factor, because larger amplicons deviate from the correction factor predictions for smaller fragments, possibly due to secondary structure formation. However, if necessary, a correction factor of + 2 for alleles with Ms-PCR nonMet sizing of up to 35 repeats, and + 3 for Ms-PCR nonMet sizes of 36-54 repeats could be considered.…”
Section: Validation Result-2mentioning
confidence: 99%