1986
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90019-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodological issues in screening for dementia: The problem of education adjustment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
92
1
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
6
92
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is unlikely to be explained only by their superior test-taking abilities (52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58). Our results also confirm such an association with education, although in our data this was especially marked in very elderly subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This is unlikely to be explained only by their superior test-taking abilities (52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58). Our results also confirm such an association with education, although in our data this was especially marked in very elderly subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The prevalence of cognitive deficit (30%), as assessed by the MMSE, was comparable with results from a survey in Canada 10 , in which 33% of a sample of elderly residents presented some degree of cognitive impairment. For the purpose of the present study it was decided to use a standard cut-off at 24 points, although there is controversy in the literature as to whether different cut-offs should be used for different educational levels 4,17,19,35 . Given the relatively high level of education of this cohort, the prevalence of cognitive impairment might not be the same in a less educated sample, as education seems to be a risk factor for more rapid and more severe cognitive decline in old age 1,7,33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different specificities were observed for AfricanAmericans (0.78) and Whites (0.94) which the authors attribute to an artifact of education: The sample contained a high proportion of African-Americans who had received relatively less education. Kittner et al [32] showed that cognitive screening measures are more specific, less sensitive and have more false negatives among the highly educated, while more false positives are observed among those with low education. Fillenbaum et al [5] examined seven cognitive screening or neuropsychological tests in relation to clinical diagnosis.…”
Section: Statistical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%