2019
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metacommunity patterns of Amazonian Odonata: the role of environmental gradients and major rivers

Abstract: Background We identified and classified damselfly (Zygoptera) and dragonfly (Anisoptera) metacommunities in Brazilian Amazonia, relating species distribution patterns to known biological gradients and biogeographical history. We expected a random distribution of both Zygoptera and Anisoptera within interfluves. At the Amazonian scale, we expected Anisoptera metacommunities to be randomly distributed due to their higher dispersal ability and large environmental tolerance. In contrast, we expected… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(151 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The association between Zygoptera species composition and regional factors has been reported before (e.g. Heiser & Schmitt, 2009; Brasil et al ., 2014; Pires et al ., 2018; Alves‐Martins et al ., 2019). Zygoptera have smaller body sizes, lower metabolic rates, and lower dispersal ability (Corbet, 1999) than Anisoptera, as a result, they are more sensitive to ecological conditions (Pires et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association between Zygoptera species composition and regional factors has been reported before (e.g. Heiser & Schmitt, 2009; Brasil et al ., 2014; Pires et al ., 2018; Alves‐Martins et al ., 2019). Zygoptera have smaller body sizes, lower metabolic rates, and lower dispersal ability (Corbet, 1999) than Anisoptera, as a result, they are more sensitive to ecological conditions (Pires et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nested structures are far from rare, as they have been reported for a number of organisms such as lake fish (Braoudakis & Jackson, 2016), dragonflies (Alves‐Martins et al ., 2019), primates (Michalski & Peres, 2005), and bats (Presley et al ., 2012). Heino and colleagues (2015a; 2015b) carried out a comparative analysis of metacommunity types in freshwater environments and found that the quasi‐nested structure was the second most frequent structure after Clementsian.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) What role do environmental factors play in driving assemblage variation? In line with other metacommunity studies (Jyrkänkallio‐Mikkola et al ., 2017; Alves‐Martins et al ., 2019; Cai et al ., 2019), we focused on water quality, climate, hydrology, land cover, and physical variables. (iii) Are there differences in the metacommunity structure and influence of environmental drivers between different macroinvertebrate groups?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this, when the whole metacommunity (core + satellite species) is analyzed, a nested subset pattern is observed, with ME operating as the structuring mechanism and distribution of fish community species correlated with local (core species) and regional (satellite species) conditions. The loss of Clementsian (core species) and clumped species (all the other metacommunities) indicate the presence of barriers responsible for the formation of subsets of communities within the metacommunity (Alves‐Martins et al, 2019). In the case of Paraná River streams, physicochemical water characteristics and main channel morphology was identified as barrier for fish species as indicated by MRT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%