2020
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elements of fish metacommunity structure in Neotropical freshwater streams

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metacommunity theory has been widely used to explain the distribution patterns of many groups, such as fishes (Palheta et al, 2021; Vieira et al, 2020), bats (Bogoni et al, 2022; Presley & Willig, 2010), invertebrates (Cunha & Juen, 2020; Tonkin et al, 2015) and plants (González‐Caro et al, 2021; Oliveira et al, 2018). Despite the important contributions of this theory to understanding the organisation of biological communities, most metacommunity studies are focused on discrete archetypes which ignore the existence of numerous processes implicit to them (e.g., niche breadth and species interactions) (Thompson et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metacommunity theory has been widely used to explain the distribution patterns of many groups, such as fishes (Palheta et al, 2021; Vieira et al, 2020), bats (Bogoni et al, 2022; Presley & Willig, 2010), invertebrates (Cunha & Juen, 2020; Tonkin et al, 2015) and plants (González‐Caro et al, 2021; Oliveira et al, 2018). Despite the important contributions of this theory to understanding the organisation of biological communities, most metacommunity studies are focused on discrete archetypes which ignore the existence of numerous processes implicit to them (e.g., niche breadth and species interactions) (Thompson et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coherence relates to how species responds to the same environmental gradient, the range turnover re ects how community composition varies along the gradient, and range boundary clumping indicates the degree to which species range boundaries occur together (Leibold & Mikkelson, 2002;. Using the EMS framework, previous studies have identi ed a series of idealized metacommunity patterns in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems (Alahuhta & Heino, 2013;Bonthoux & Balent, 2015;Heino et al, 2015c;Vieira et al, 2020). However, the best-t species distribution modals for a given metacommunity are largely context dependent and usually showed distinct patterns with regard to organisms, spatial scale, and environmental gradients (Erős et al, 2017;Tonkin et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%