2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Comparing Off-Pump With On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
2
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
41
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Se ha descrito que la cirugía sin CEC se asocia a un menor número de puentes que la cirugía con CEC 6,22,23 . Creemos que esto no necesariamente refleja una revascularización incompleta.…”
Section: Resultados Inmediatosunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Se ha descrito que la cirugía sin CEC se asocia a un menor número de puentes que la cirugía con CEC 6,22,23 . Creemos que esto no necesariamente refleja una revascularización incompleta.…”
Section: Resultados Inmediatosunclassified
“…Exceptuando por la necesidad de revascularización, la mayoría de los autores concuerdan en que los resultados alejados son comparables entre ambas técnicas 22,[26][27][28][29] .…”
Section: Resultados Alejadosunclassified
“…A significantly lowered patency for saphenous vein grafts than for internal thoracic artery grafts was suggested to result from the type of graft, presence of hyperlipidemia, the exposure and quality of stabilization, and increased procoagulant activity in OPCAB patients [6,11]. Although some studies demonstrated similar early vein graft patencies between OPCAB and conventional CABG [12][13][14], other meta-analysis using five randomized studies showed that OPCAB significantly increased the risk of graft failure, with the odds of graft occlusion 51% higher within the first postoperative year [5]. Those differences were mainly attributable to the lower saphenous vein or radial artery graft patency rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With resurgent interest in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB), a favorable composite of death, stroke, and myocardial infarction was demonstrated in patients undergoing OPCAB [3]. With regard to graft patency, however, patients undergoing OPCAB demonstrated a lower graft patency than patients undergoing conventional CABG [4,5], and concerns have been raised about the further lowered patency of saphenous vein grafts in patients undergoing OPCAB compared with patients undergoing conventional CABG [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11] However, many recent reports including the analysis of randomized control studies have evoked the controversial arguments against the superiority of OPCAB including mortality and morbidity such as incidence of stroke, perioperative myocardial infarction and renal failure. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] In addition, less complete revascularization rate 12,13) and poor graft patency in OPCAB 16,18) are suspected the main cause of high incidence of repeat revascularization compared with conventional CABG. 9,16,17) Even with the hands of Japanese experts for OPCAB, early graft patency without stenosis was inferior to that of on-pump CABG.…”
Section: Comparison Between Opcab and On-pump Cardiac Arrest Cabgmentioning
confidence: 99%