Abstract:Objective: We studied the postoperative 1-year results after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) with one or more saphenous vein grafts. Methods: We compared the clinical and angiographic results of 833 patients who underwent OPCAB between 1998 and 2004. Group 1 patients (n = 135) received one or more vein grafts. Group 2 patients (n = 698) received total arterial grafts. Coronary angiographies were performed early postoperatively (n = 804, 1.6 AE 1.5 days), and 1 year postoperatively (n = 671, 12.… Show more
“…Only a few studies conducted in a small number of patients have reported results of CABG using SV composite grafts, and this graft configuration is controversial [6-8,14]. The SV graft may be regarded as a major ITA collateral branch whose caliber is significantly larger than that of the main artery itself.…”
BackgroundThe safety and efficacy of arterial composite grafts for total arterial revascularization have been demonstrated. The saphenous vein (SV) is a widely used graft because of its accessibility, sufficient length, and ease of manipulation. Our aim was to compare mid-term outcomes of saphenous vein Y-grafts with radial artery Y-grafts joined by anastomosis to the left internal thoracic artery.Materials and MethodsRecords of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with composite Y-grafts based on the left internal thoracic artery technique in 552 patients were analyzed retrospectively. After propensity score matching, 79 radial arterial (RA) composite grafts (RA group) and 79 saphenous vein composite grafts (SV group) were compared. The duration of mean follow-up was 24.6±14.6 months (range, 1 to 55 months).ResultsThere were no differences in surgical mortality, all-cause mortality, or morbidity among the groups. Rates of 4-year survival were 91.7% and 96.3% in the RA and SV groups, respectively (p=0.519). The coronary reintervention-free survival rate and freedom from major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events were similar in the two groups (p=0.685, p=0.564).ConclusionConstruction of composite Y-grafts using the radial artery or saphenous vein showed similar mid-term results. Long-term follow-up and randomized trials will be needed to confirm our present conclusions.
“…Only a few studies conducted in a small number of patients have reported results of CABG using SV composite grafts, and this graft configuration is controversial [6-8,14]. The SV graft may be regarded as a major ITA collateral branch whose caliber is significantly larger than that of the main artery itself.…”
BackgroundThe safety and efficacy of arterial composite grafts for total arterial revascularization have been demonstrated. The saphenous vein (SV) is a widely used graft because of its accessibility, sufficient length, and ease of manipulation. Our aim was to compare mid-term outcomes of saphenous vein Y-grafts with radial artery Y-grafts joined by anastomosis to the left internal thoracic artery.Materials and MethodsRecords of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with composite Y-grafts based on the left internal thoracic artery technique in 552 patients were analyzed retrospectively. After propensity score matching, 79 radial arterial (RA) composite grafts (RA group) and 79 saphenous vein composite grafts (SV group) were compared. The duration of mean follow-up was 24.6±14.6 months (range, 1 to 55 months).ResultsThere were no differences in surgical mortality, all-cause mortality, or morbidity among the groups. Rates of 4-year survival were 91.7% and 96.3% in the RA and SV groups, respectively (p=0.519). The coronary reintervention-free survival rate and freedom from major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events were similar in the two groups (p=0.685, p=0.564).ConclusionConstruction of composite Y-grafts using the radial artery or saphenous vein showed similar mid-term results. Long-term follow-up and randomized trials will be needed to confirm our present conclusions.
“…A significantly lowered patency for saphenous vein grafts relative to ITA grafts has been suggested to result from the type of graft, presence of dyslipidemia, exposure and quality of stabilization, and increased procoagulatory activity in OPCAB patients. 10,15,16 A previous study that used early postoperative angiography 17 demonstrated an overall graft patency rate among patients who received venous grafts significantly lower than that among patients who received total arterial grafts. Multivariable logistic regression analysis failed to demonstrate early experience as an independent predictor, and venous graft use itself was an independent predictor of graft failure during the first postoperative year after OPCAB.…”
Early patency of venous grafts was significantly lower than that of arterial grafts. Intraoperative flowmetry and revision of abnormal grafts improved early graft patency, and reoperation according to early angiographic findings may further improve graft patency.
“…Although prospective randomized trials carried in the hands of surgeon with high level of expertise have shown that early patency and adequacy of the revascularization could be equivalent between on and off-pump revascularization [83,91], meta-analyses have reported a decrease in the number of grafts with OPCAB surgery and a lower patency rate especially with vein graft [92,93]. However, recent studies tend to demonstrate similar transit-time flowmetric results, as well as comparable graft flow reserve with both techniques [94].…”
Although OPCAB surgery has gained popularity over the past 15 years, its benefit regarding operative mortality and major complications has not been clearly defined in the general population. There is a body of literature supporting its benefit in the elderly population. OPCAB surgery has the potential of decreasing operative mortality and major postoperative complications such as stroke, delirium, atrial fibrillation, and decline in neurocognitive functions in these patients. Off-pump surgery is technically more demanding and has been blamed for providing less complete revascularization and lower graft patency rate, especially in less experienced hands. However, with the upcoming demographic explosion of senior citizens in western societies, OPCAB surgery has definitely to be a part of the armamentarium of modern cardiac surgeons.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.