2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b04010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesoscale Particle-Based Model of Electrophoretic Deposition

Abstract: We present and evaluate a semiempirical particle-based model of electrophoretic deposition using extensive mesoscale simulations. We analyze particle configurations in order to observe how colloids accumulate at the electrode and arrange into deposits. In agreement with existing continuum models, the thickness of the deposit increases linearly in time during deposition. Resulting colloidal deposits exhibit a transition between highly ordered and bulk disordered regions that can give rise to an appreciable dens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Figure b indicates that fill fractions much lower than 0.55 can maximize the scattering power (Region A), and the remaining question is whether one can experimentally achieve such low fill fractions. Giera et al recently discovered that the fill fraction can be as low as 0.4 when the microspheres undergo high-voltage-driven sedimentation . At this low fill fraction, we predict that light scattering with properly sized microspheres can be stronger than at f ≥ 0.55.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…However, Figure b indicates that fill fractions much lower than 0.55 can maximize the scattering power (Region A), and the remaining question is whether one can experimentally achieve such low fill fractions. Giera et al recently discovered that the fill fraction can be as low as 0.4 when the microspheres undergo high-voltage-driven sedimentation . At this low fill fraction, we predict that light scattering with properly sized microspheres can be stronger than at f ≥ 0.55.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…From the point of view of dispersion, the mechanism of stabilization (electrostatic/electrosteric) should promote the individual movement of dispersed nanoentities. However, it is necessary to consider that the yield rate prevail over other parameters, and the solid content, the electrophoretic mobility (zeta potential) and the conductivity should be adjusted to avoid the massive arrival of particles to the electrode, and also the premature agglomeration of nanoplatelets that can disturbs the contribution of the osmotic flow of the solvent to the nanoplatelets ordering, predicted by models [16,17,18]. Those premises should be considering in the fabrication by EPD of electrodes and structures based on nanoplatelets stacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deposition yield can be correlated with various deposition parameters, regardless of the detailed mechanism. Hamaker's law can be used to develop useful mathematical expressions for EPD kinetics [73]. The thickness of which is determined by the EPD parameters, and the morphology of which depends on the deposited substrates [74].…”
Section: Electrophoretic Deposition (Epd)mentioning
confidence: 99%