Mental Health Screening at School

Stiffler, Meghan C.; Dever, Bridget V.

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19171-3

Cited by 38 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 116 publications

(156 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, teachers could undergo implicit bias training to help address possible gender and race stereotypes. Finally, in practice, schools following recommended guidelines (Lane, Menzies, Oakes, & Kalberg, 2012; Stiffler & Dever, 2015) interpret teacher-rated universal SEB screening results within the context of other extant data, such as office discipline referrals, attendance, and/or academic performance and collect additional data when indicated. Our results suggest that schools should continue to use multi-informant, multimethod approaches to accurately identify students in need of extra support.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Student, teacher, and classroom predictors of between-teacher variance of students’ teacher-rated behavior.

Splett

Smith-Millman

Raborn

et al. 2018

School Psychology Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current study examined between-teacher variance in teacher ratings of student behavioral and emotional risk to identify student, teacher and classroom characteristics that predict such differences and can be considered in future research and practice. Data were taken from seven elementary schools in one school district implementing universal screening, including 1,241 students rated by 68 teachers. Students were mostly African America (68.5%) with equal gender (female 50.1%) and grade-level distributions. Teachers, mostly White (76.5%) and female (89.7%), completed both a background survey regarding their professional experiences and demographic characteristics and the Behavior Assessment System for Children (Second Edition) Behavioral and Emotional Screening System-Teacher Form for all students in their class, rating an average of 17.69 students each. Extant student data were provided by the district. Analyses followed multilevel linear model stepwise model-building procedures. We detected a significant amount of variance in teachers' ratings of students' behavioral and emotional risk at both student and teacher/classroom levels with student predictors explaining about 39% of student-level variance and teacher/classroom predictors explaining about 20% of between-teacher differences. The final model fit the data (Akaike information criterion = 8,687.709; pseudo-R2 = 0.544) significantly better than the null model (Akaike information criterion = 9,457.160). Significant predictors included student gender, race ethnicity, academic performance and disciplinary incidents, teacher gender, student-teacher gender interaction, teacher professional development in behavior screening, and classroom academic performance. Future research and practice should interpret teacher-rated universal screening of students' behavioral and emotional risk with consideration of the between-teacher variance unrelated to student behavior detected. (PsycINFO Database Record

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Student, teacher, and classroom predictors of between-teacher variance of students’ teacher-rated behavior.

Splett

Smith-Millman

Raborn

et al. 2018

School Psychology Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Setelah melakukan adaptasi langkah selanjutnya adalah memeriksa validitas dan reliabilitas GHQ 28 dengan sampel masyarakat Indonesia. Evaluasi psikometris merupakan hal yang penting karena keberhasilan intervensi awal bergantung pada keakuratan dan utilitas alat skrining untuk mengidentifikasi WACANA seseorang dengan risiko tinggi mengalami gangguan kesehatan mental (Stiffler & Dever, 2015). Evaluasi psikometris yang dimaksud di sini adalah memeriksa reliabilitas dan validitas konstruk GHQ 28.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Evaluasi Psikometris General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) 28 Pada Subjek Mahasiswa di Semarang, Jawa Tengah

Syafitri¹

2020

WACANA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

the age range of adolescents through young adults are considered susceptive to various mental health problems. It is also reported in news and research reports that college students which are falls in that age rage category, have high probability of experiencing mental health problems. One of the most important obstacles in mental health system in Indonesia is the lack of mental health screening tool. There already some screening tools existed but there is not adequate information related to their psychometric evaluation such validity and reliability. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric property of General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) 28 which has been adapted to Indonesian language previously, to see whether it has satisfying reliability and validity, also factor analysis. The subjects of this research are 356 undergradute stduents from various university in Semarang City, Central Java. The result showed that GHQ 28 has Alpha Cronbach reliability coefficient 0,897 which considered as satisfying. Factor analysis result also showed that it has four factor solutions which confirm the origninal four factors which construct GHQ 28. In general, GHQ 28 Indonesian version has adequate psychometric properties.Abstrak: usia remaja hingga dewasa dianggap sebagai masa yang rentan terhadap masalah kesehatan mental. Dilaporkan dalam berbagai berita maupun penelitian mahasiswa juga merupakan segmen memiliki kemungkinan tinggi mengalami masalah kesehatan mental. Salah satu hambatan utama dalam penanganan kesehatan mental di Indonesia adalah kurangnya alat skrining kesehatan mental yang adekuat. Telah terdapat beberapa alat skrining tetapi tidak disertai dengan informasi tentang evaluasi psikometris yang memadai. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi properti psikometris alat skrining General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) 28 yang sebelumnya telah diadaptasi ke dalam bahasa Indonesia untuk melihat apakah alat ini memiliki reliabilitas dan validitas yang memadai sebagai alat skrining dan memiliki faktor struktur yang sesuai dengan acuan teoretisnya. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 356 mahasiswa S1 dari berbagai universitas di Kota Semarang. Hasilnya, didapatkan koefisien reliabiliatas Alpha Cronbach 0,897 yang dianggap memuaskan. Hasil analisis faktor menunjukkan terdapat empat faktor sesuai dengan faktor asli penyusun GHQ 28. Secara umum, GHQ 28 versi terjemahan bahasa Indonesia memiliki properti psikometris yang cukup baik.Kata kunci: evaluasi psikometris, General Health Questionnaire, kesehatan mental, mahasiswa WACANA

show abstract

“…Schools are uniquely placed to treat inequity; however, previous research has revealed a special kind of ineptitude in this area. School policies often reflect the larger societal systemic problems (Scott et al, 2017), with many policies (e.g., “zero‐tolerance,” the use of office discipline referrals [ODRs], and school suspensions) exacerbating inequity rather than curtailing it (Stiffler & Dever, 2015). Research shows that the percentage of K‐12 public schools with a majority population of students who are CLD is growing.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Equitable practices in school mental health

DeBoer

Allouche

Vasquez

et al. 2022

Psychology in the Schools

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Given the prevalence and negative outcomes associated with untreated mental health concerns, there is an urgent need for schools to enhance their capacity to prevent, identify, and address these needs. This is particularly important for students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, who are more likely to be underserved and face barriers to mental health treatment. Current methods of addressing mental health at school are reactive and insufficient, failing to address the needs of all students. Without an explicit focus on dismantling systemic racism and inequity within schools, our society will continue to underserve those already disenfranchised. As such, this paper outlines the challenges as well as the importance of incorporating culture into a conceptualization of universal mental health in schools. We include state‐, district‐, and school‐level solutions in this conceptualization. Specifically, we propose sample solutions to the implementation of equity‐focused, comprehensive mental health practices within a multitiered system of support, focusing predominantly on universal (i.e., tier 1 level) practices.

show abstract

Mental Health Screening at School

Cited by 38 publications

References 116 publications

Student, teacher, and classroom predictors of between-teacher variance of students’ teacher-rated behavior.

Student, teacher, and classroom predictors of between-teacher variance of students’ teacher-rated behavior.

Evaluasi Psikometris General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) 28 Pada Subjek Mahasiswa di Semarang, Jawa Tengah

Equitable practices in school mental health

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About