Student, teacher, and classroom predictors of between-teacher variance of students’ teacher-rated behavior.

Abstract

The current study examined between-teacher variance in teacher ratings of student behavioral and emotional risk to identify student, teacher and classroom characteristics that predict such differences and can be considered in future research and practice. Data were taken from seven elementary schools in one school district implementing universal screening, including 1,241 students rated by 68 teachers. Students were mostly African America (68.5%) with equal gender (female 50.1%) and grade-level distributions. Teachers, mostly White (76.5%) and female (89.7%), completed both a background survey regarding their professional experiences and demographic characteristics and the Behavior Assessment System for Children (Second Edition) Behavioral and Emotional Screening System-Teacher Form for all students in their class, rating an average of 17.69 students each. Extant student data were provided by the district. Analyses followed multilevel linear model stepwise model-building procedures. We detected a significant amount of variance in teachers' ratings of students' behavioral and emotional risk at both student and teacher/classroom levels with student predictors explaining about 39% of student-level variance and teacher/classroom predictors explaining about 20% of between-teacher differences. The final model fit the data (Akaike information criterion = 8,687.709; pseudo-R2 = 0.544) significantly better than the null model (Akaike information criterion = 9,457.160). Significant predictors included student gender, race ethnicity, academic performance and disciplinary incidents, teacher gender, student-teacher gender interaction, teacher professional development in behavior screening, and classroom academic performance. Future research and practice should interpret teacher-rated universal screening of students' behavioral and emotional risk with consideration of the between-teacher variance unrelated to student behavior detected. (PsycINFO Database Record

Examining teachers’ perceptions of K‐11 students’ 21st century skills and student performance

“…In this investigation, teachers’ length of acquaintance with students was used as the teacher‐level grouping variable. This is congruent with recommendations that variations at the teacher‐level be taken into consideration when examining teacher ratings (Splett et al, ).…”

“…Splett et al () asserted teacher variables (e.g., educational level, etc.) should be considered when examining teachers’ behavioral ratings of students.…”

Comparison of Universal Mental Health Screening to Students Already Receiving Intervention in a Multitiered System of Support

“…Furthermore, a significant body of research has identified key indicators beyond academic and behavioral functioning predictive of students’ need for mental health intervention. The behavior of students who are male and/or African American tends to be rated as more problematic or in need of mental health intervention than their female and/or Caucasian counterparts (Rosenfield & Mouzon, 2013; Splett et al, in press). Behavioral risk has also been found to increase or intensify over time with students identified in kindergarten with any mental health symptom experiencing the greatest impairment by Grade 5 (Essex et al, 2009).…”

A study of an adapted social–emotional learning: Small group curriculum in a school setting

“…Additionally, all of the data used in the current study were teacher reported. While teachers are an important data source and are often called upon to provide data about their students (Sandomierski, Kincaid, & Algozinne, ), teacher‐reports of student behavior are vulnerable to bias (Smith‐Millman et al, ; Splett et al, ). Thus, the reliance solely on teacher‐reported data is potentially problematic.…”