2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11031-011-9222-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mental contrasting facilitates academic performance in school children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding perseverance, as pointed out above, mental contrasting under high expectations increases energization, but it also, improves rote learning (A. Gollwitzer, Oettingen, Kirby, Duckworth, & Mayer, 2011), heightens math and language grades (Oettingen, Hönig, & Gollwitzer, 2000, Study 1;Oettingen et al, 2001;Study 4), and fosters activities to reduce cigarette consumption (Oettingen, Mayer, & Thorpe, 2010).…”
Section: Mental Contrasting and Creative Performancementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Regarding perseverance, as pointed out above, mental contrasting under high expectations increases energization, but it also, improves rote learning (A. Gollwitzer, Oettingen, Kirby, Duckworth, & Mayer, 2011), heightens math and language grades (Oettingen, Hönig, & Gollwitzer, 2000, Study 1;Oettingen et al, 2001;Study 4), and fosters activities to reduce cigarette consumption (Oettingen, Mayer, & Thorpe, 2010).…”
Section: Mental Contrasting and Creative Performancementioning
confidence: 91%
“…the positive effects of MC on time management and academic performance (20,21). The effects are mediated by both cognitive and motivational mechanisms.…”
Section: Mental Contrasting With Implementation Intentionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In one study by Gollwitzer et al (2011) a group of third graders were told to imagine a candy prize they would receive if they finished a language assignment and then to imagine several of their own behaviors that could prevent them from winning the award. A second group of students was instructed only to fantasize about winning the prize.…”
Section: Implications Of the Stockdale Paradoxmentioning
confidence: 99%