Mengkaji Ruang Publik dari Perspektif Kuasa: Fenomena Kemenangan Aktor Hegemonik Melalui Dominasi Budaya

Arditama, Erisandi

doi:10.15294/jpi.v1i1.9181

Cited by 5 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Instead, they present, occupy, and participate in it using money and influence to use the public. Generally, these actors have a social identity in the form of strong social legitimacy in society (Arditama, 2016).…”

Section: Power Relation In the Paternalistic Public Sphere Problem In...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In Madura, the public space at the local level is not an open space without power at all, as Habermas' idealization is, but a meeting place for various actors with different interests. In fact, Gramsci's idea of hegemony and power relations is also very possible (Arditama, 2016). Gramsci's opinion is relatively more accurate in describing the conception of a typical Madurese public sphere, where the concept of the power of religious leaders has been embedded in the subconscious of the participants in public discussions so that it is considered a natural thing and is accepted without burden.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Contesting space and power: Rethinking Habermas’s public sphere on the Madurese paternalistic ideology

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The public sphere is not always what Jürgen Habermas imagines, which is inclusive, egalitarian and pressure-free. In the Madurese paternalistic constellation, the dominations of power over the contestation of public opinion and action become prominent in the relationship between participants/actors. A meeting between different interests causes this contestation. The struggle for influence is also shown by the dominance of ‘capital’ or resources. In Madura, Kiai are considered to have ‘charismatic’ symbolic capital related to the historical and cultural aspects of the Madurese ethnicity. This makes the figure of Kiai (along with Blater as a twin regime) become the center of consensus-making in a paternalistic public discussion. This phenomenological qualitative research becomes interesting when the world view of the local community is connected with Habermas’ perspective through the idea of European version of the bourgeois public sphere, which is considered not applicable to the local genius Madurese realm. The arena of public sphere in the Tanean Lanjhang pattern and the existence of ‘langgar’ (mosque) in the social community rejects the characterization of Habermas and brings a new definition of Madurese paternalistic public sphere, which is hegemony-mutualistic, as one of the richness of Indonesian cultural patterns.

show abstract

Section: Power Relation In the Paternalistic Public Sphere Problem In...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contesting space and power: Rethinking Habermas’s public sphere on the Madurese paternalistic ideology

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Dalam penelitian ini dapat dilihat bahwa tokoh yang dituakan, menjadi aktor yang hegemonik. (Arditama, 2016).…”

Section: B Tinjauan Pustaka Teori Ruang Publik Habermasunclassified

Analisis Demokrasi Habermas Pada Teks Forum Diskusi Online Ruu Omnibus Law

Safitri

2020

Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Efek

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

According to habermas, public space is a space where citizens can negotiate about their relations so that it is an institutional arena for interaction. The development of increasingly advanced communication media has resulted in a large amount of public space being carried out online through social media to discuss public issues with the aim of creating a democracy. This study aims to determine the analysis of habermas democracy in the text of the online discussion forum of the omnibus law ruu as democracy. The labor law omnibus is still a polemic in the community because on the one hand it is considered to be beneficial for employers and increasingly marginalizes workers / laborers with an hourly wage system plan which is considered by workers to weaken the position and welfare of workers / workers. This research uses analytical methods in the perspective of communication on deliberative democracy and based on two habermas theories of Structural Transformation of Public Spaces & Between Facts and Norms. This discourse analysis model is based on 3 blades of communicative action analysis that includes 3 claims. The data collection technique is a text method in the form of opinions submitted by members of the online discussion group "Work Draft Bill: Threatening Indonesian Employment and Agriculture" and "Work Draft Bill: Breaking Through Indonesian Law?". Each argument / opinion is analyzed based on three validity claims, namely: truth. accuracy, and honesty. The results of this study are based on text analysis that burdensome parties from laborers, students, farmers, fishermen, indigenous peoples, rural and urban residents, and prioritizes the interests of investors and entrepreneurs

show abstract

“…Munculnya ruang publik tidak dapat maupun dilepasakn dari persoalan relasi kuasa yang informasi dibangun oleh kaum borjuis, kondisi ini melahirkan ruang terjadinya relasi kuasa yang baru dan berbeda. Ruang publik tersebut diartikan ruang tempat bertemunya beragam kepentingan (Arditama, 2017). Teori ini peneliti anggap relevan dengan permasalahan yang akan diteliti karena teori ini melihat simbol yang mengandung makna dan sesuai dengan apa yang akan peneliti dalam alek pacu jawi dalam tahun politik yang banyak menggunakan simbol-simbol dan makna dari simbol tersebut.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

“…Ruang publik tersebut diartikakan ruang tempat bertemunya beragam kepentingan. Kontestasi kuasa untuk memenangkan pengaruh dan penerimaan publik atas suatu isu di dalam ruang publik pun menjadi keniscayaan (Arditama, 2017…”

Section: Baju-baju Kepartaianunclassified

Pacu Jawi Dalam Tahun Politik Di Kabupaten Tanah Datar

Irvan¹,

Fitriani²

2019

perspektif

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstrak Penelitian ini membahas makna dibalik simbol seluruh kegiatan pacu jawi dalam tahun politik di Kabupaten Tanah Datar. Penelitian ini dianalisis menggunakan teori Interpretivisme simbolik yang dikemukakan oleh Clifford Geertz. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengann pendekatan kualitatif dengann tipe penelitian studi kasus. Pemilihan informan dilakukan secara purposive sampling dengann jumlah informan 19 orang. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengann cara observasi partisipasi aktif, wawancara mendalam, dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian dari makna dibalik simbol pacu jawi dalam tahun politik ditemukan beberapa hal terkait dengann pacu jawi dalam tahun politik.(1) pacu jawi sebagai penguatan elit adat dalam Nagari, (2) pacu jawi sebagai identitas pemilik jawi, orang yang mengurus jawi, joki, dan Porwi, (3) pacu jawi sebagai ruang publik, (4) pacu jawi sebagai sumber ekonomi, (5) pacu jawi sebagai peranan pemuda, (6) pacu jawi sebagai identitas Nagari, (7) pacu jawi sebagai objek wisata.

show abstract

Mengkaji Ruang Publik dari Perspektif Kuasa: Fenomena Kemenangan Aktor Hegemonik Melalui Dominasi Budaya

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Contesting space and power: Rethinking Habermas’s public sphere on the Madurese paternalistic ideology

Contesting space and power: Rethinking Habermas’s public sphere on the Madurese paternalistic ideology

Analisis Demokrasi Habermas Pada Teks Forum Diskusi Online Ruu Omnibus Law

Pacu Jawi Dalam Tahun Politik Di Kabupaten Tanah Datar

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About