Microelectromechanical Systems 2002
DOI: 10.1115/imece2002-39205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meeting the MEMS “Design-to-Analysis” Challenge: The SUMMiT® V Design Tool Environment

Abstract: This paper describes the SUMMiT® V Design Tools, a suite of CAD tools that enable a SUMMiT® (Sandia Ultra-Planar Multilevel MEMS Technology) MEMS designer to meet the ‘Design-To-Analysis’ challenge. Sandia has developed a MEMS design tool suite integrated with a commercial 3D mechanical CAD tool, AutoCAD®. Designed for use with the SUMMiT® process, it includes in-house written design tools: a 2D Process Visualizer [2], a fast 3D Visualizer, a detailed 3D Model Generator [3], a finite element mesh generator [4]… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The silicon structures were fabricated using the SUMMiT-lite process at Sandia, which uses a subset of the layers comprising the full SUMMiT process [9]. A 3-D model cross section of the final structure is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Design and Microfabrication Of Silicon Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The silicon structures were fabricated using the SUMMiT-lite process at Sandia, which uses a subset of the layers comprising the full SUMMiT process [9]. A 3-D model cross section of the final structure is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Design and Microfabrication Of Silicon Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure a consistent design interface and to facilitate successful design implementation, special tools have been developed by SNL to aid in devising of functional designs for successful fabrication in the SUMMiT ® process [53–56].…”
Section: Mems Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, an isotropic deposition can cause surfaces to self-intersect and "delooping" these self-intersections is prone to numerical instability. Therefore, this technique can fail for complicated fabrication processes [Varadhan and Manocha 2004;Yarberry 2002]. Moreover, this technique does not yield accurate geometry ] and also suffers from high computational and memory requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional approach to MEMS process geometric modeling [Yarberry 2002] is to perform all the operations using a solid geometry kernel. The large topological changes which occur in the geometry while simulating the fabrication steps make maintenance of the explicit boundary representation difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%