2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b03005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of Protonic Surface Transport in Porous Oxides: Example of YSZ

Abstract: The electrical properties and the charge carrier mechanism of porous 8 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia (8YSZ) ceramic samples have been investigated over wide ranges of relative humidity (RH) and temperature (25-400 ºC). The presence of humidity introduces protonic surface conduction, and porous YSZ shows pure protonic conduction below ~150 ºC. H/D isotope effect studies combined with transport number measurements reveal a change in transport mechanism from structural diffusion (Grotthuss type) to vehicular tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
105
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
8
105
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, after chemical stabilization of the first layer, the water vapor is physically adsorbed onto the first chemisorbed layer (Figure S11b, Supporting Information). Upon coverage of the surface with water molecules, protons migrate through the medium along with hydronium ions (H 3 O + ), which is demonstrated by a vehicle mechanism . As the water molecule layer continuously forms on the surface, extra layers are developed on the first physisorbed layer, changing the physisorption from single to multilayer (Figure S11c, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, after chemical stabilization of the first layer, the water vapor is physically adsorbed onto the first chemisorbed layer (Figure S11b, Supporting Information). Upon coverage of the surface with water molecules, protons migrate through the medium along with hydronium ions (H 3 O + ), which is demonstrated by a vehicle mechanism . As the water molecule layer continuously forms on the surface, extra layers are developed on the first physisorbed layer, changing the physisorption from single to multilayer (Figure S11c, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hopping mechanism was predominant in this zone. The temperature dependence of the conductivity in this temperature range shows a strong negative activation energy, which can be ascribed to the strong dependence of the amount of absorbed water on temperature [44].…”
Section: Hopping Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The amount of water adsorbed on an oxide surface is described by Langmuir and BET theory which depends on the thermodynamics of the water adsorption reaction [42,43]. Norby et al [44] investigated the structure of an absorbed water layer on surfaces of yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) as a function of temperature and humidity. At 30% relative humidity (RH), the water layer consisted of three monolayers; two chemisorbed water layers and one physiosorbed water that in combination displayed an ''ice-like'' structure [45].…”
Section: Proton Conduction At Low Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the factors governing proton conductivity are regarded as the strength of the O-H stretching bond of the adsorbed H 2 O and the amount of H 2 O adsorbed on the surface. 15,25 From results of DRIFTS and TG measurements, it was presumed that enhancement of proton conductivity by Al doping was attributable to an increase of the adsorbed H 2 O amount, not to a change in the O-H stretching bond strength. Consequently, the Al doping effect to CeO 2 was identied as the increase of H 2 O amount over the catalyst surface, which contributes to the promotion of surface proton hopping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, both supports showed typical Arrhenius behavior: the conductivity decreased with decreasing temperature. In this temperature region (373 K < T < 673 K), the dominant conductive carrier mechanism was estimated as electron diffusion in the inner bulk, 15,25 because there is no surface adsorbate. Comparison of the behaviors of CeO 2 and Al-CeO 2 reveals that the apparent activation energy and the conductive magnitude were almost equal.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Proton Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%