2021
DOI: 10.1007/s41204-021-00175-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical strength optimization and simulation of cement kiln dust concrete using extreme vertex design method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 12 presents the generated regression model summary with a standard regression error of 1.613 and a coe cient of determination of 99.86%, which indicates very good prediction performance as it represents the variation (%) in the response explicated by the developed regression model presented in Table 13. Figure 10 presents the multiple linear regression (MLR) residual plot that ensures that the regression model assumptions are satis ed; the statistical plots show the normal probability plot of the residuals in percent, the tted value vs. residuals ranging from −1.0 to 1.0, frequency distribution histogram of the residuals and the residuals against the observation order (%) [65,66].…”
Section: Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 12 presents the generated regression model summary with a standard regression error of 1.613 and a coe cient of determination of 99.86%, which indicates very good prediction performance as it represents the variation (%) in the response explicated by the developed regression model presented in Table 13. Figure 10 presents the multiple linear regression (MLR) residual plot that ensures that the regression model assumptions are satis ed; the statistical plots show the normal probability plot of the residuals in percent, the tted value vs. residuals ranging from −1.0 to 1.0, frequency distribution histogram of the residuals and the residuals against the observation order (%) [65,66].…”
Section: Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using Student’s t -test and ANOVA, the adequacy of the constructed Scheffe’s model was tested using the experiment’s control points. Figure 11 illustrates the experimental or actual control laboratory flexural responses, as well as the values obtained from the developed Scheffe’s simplex-lattice quadratic model [ 72 ].…”
Section: Results Discussion and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These adjustments consider multicollinearity conditions to enable the attainment of favorable conditions and achieve a desirability score of 1.0 within the boundary conditions of 0 ≤ d(yi) ≤ 1. The optimization component of this experimental design seeks the combination of mixture ratios in the feasible factor space, simultaneously satisfying the formulated and imposed criteria on the response parameters and corresponding factor levels 57 . The primary goal of the optimization is set to maximize the target responses, while the combination ratios of the four components are set within the in-range option to determine the optimal proportion of factor levels that yield a maximum response, as detailed in Table 13 .…”
Section: Development and Validation Of The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%