2004
DOI: 10.1109/jmems.2004.836815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Property Characterization of LPCVD Silicon Nitride Thin Films at Cryogenic Temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the temperature effect on the Young's modulus is roughly one order of magnitude larger than the effect of thermal expansion. The same is true, e.g., for silicon nitride with˛D 2:3 ppm/K and˛E 87 ppm/K [21]. The two mechanisms involved are acting in the opposite way.…”
Section: Stress Released Resonatorsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Hence, the temperature effect on the Young's modulus is roughly one order of magnitude larger than the effect of thermal expansion. The same is true, e.g., for silicon nitride with˛D 2:3 ppm/K and˛E 87 ppm/K [21]. The two mechanisms involved are acting in the opposite way.…”
Section: Stress Released Resonatorsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The calculation assumes a SiN x membrane with residual tensile stress of 200 MPa and a Young's modulus of 300 GPa. 86,87 In these calculations of the maximum deflection under differential pressure, it was assumed that the membrane is able to withstand the pressure up to the maximum amount displayed in the plots. In reality, the membrane may fracture at some point as the pressure is increased.…”
Section: Thin-film Silicon Nitride Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24] Dynamic measurement principles utilizing resonance frequency determination of vibrating thin films are also in use. [25][26][27] Other common methods rely on X-ray diffractometry 28,29 and Raman spectroscopy. 30,31 All these methods have their pros and cons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 However, it suffers from the same drawback as other resonant techniques because it requires knowledge of the mass density of the thin a) film which can differ considerably from bulk properties and is thus often also unknown. [25][26][27] This paper focuses solely on bulge testing because it is the most versatile method. In the context of elastomechanical thin film probing, the bulge test was first reported in 1959 by Beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%