2020
DOI: 10.1002/pen.25519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical, morphological, thermal properties and hydrolytic degradation behavior of polylactic acid/polypropylene carbonate blends prepared by solvent casting

Abstract: The preparation of polylactic acid (PLA) and polypropylene carbonate (PPC) blend films by using the solvent casting method is to improve the properties of pure PLA. The blends' mechanical and thermal properties, morphological as well as hydrolytic degradation behavior are evaluated. The tensile test proved that the increase of PPC from 0 wt% to 75 wt% could improve the elongation of pure PLA when the graph showed a significant increase of the elongation from 10% to 1000%. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) sup… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar open polymeric networks in other PHA/PPC blends were observed by Yang and Hu . The surface morphology of pristine PPC was observed as a featureless flat fracture surface by Haneef et al PHBV/PPC (60/40) and (40/60) blends with (Figure c,g, respectively) and without (Figure b,f, respectively) the cross-linking agent showed smoother surfaces compared to PHBV. No distinct phases of PHBV and PPC were observed in Figure b,c,f,g, which makes it hard to distinguish between individual components in the blend formulations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Similar open polymeric networks in other PHA/PPC blends were observed by Yang and Hu . The surface morphology of pristine PPC was observed as a featureless flat fracture surface by Haneef et al PHBV/PPC (60/40) and (40/60) blends with (Figure c,g, respectively) and without (Figure b,f, respectively) the cross-linking agent showed smoother surfaces compared to PHBV. No distinct phases of PHBV and PPC were observed in Figure b,c,f,g, which makes it hard to distinguish between individual components in the blend formulations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The work carried out by Zhao [ 24 ] et al shows that the elongation at break of PLA/PPC blends is much higher than neat PLA (1.9%). PPC and PLA are incompatible [ 25 , 26 , 27 ], which negatively impact its mechanical property. Phase separation in PLA/PPC blends was observed [ 25 , 26 ] and the modulus and tensile strength of the blend was reported lower than neat PLA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PPC and PLA are incompatible [ 25 , 26 , 27 ], which negatively impact its mechanical property. Phase separation in PLA/PPC blends was observed [ 25 , 26 ] and the modulus and tensile strength of the blend was reported lower than neat PLA. Flodberg [ 27 ] et al studied the PLA/PPC blend with more than 30wt% of PPC, and noticed that severe phase separation could occur, resulting in a very low elongation at break and toughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most extensively studied and produced P34HB binary blends are P34HB/polylactide (PLA), 18,19 P34HB/poly(ethylene glycol), 20 P34HB/poly(butylene succinate) (PBS), 21 P34HB/PHB, 22 P34HB/poly[(3-hydroxybutyrate)-co-(3-hydroxyvalerate)] (PHBV), 23,24 etc. Binary blends of PPC, such as PPC/PLA, 25,26 PPC/PHBV, 27 PPC/poly[(butylene adipate)-coterephthalate], 28 PPC/PHB, 29 PPC/PBS 30 and PPC/poly(butylene carbonate), 31 have been investigated intensively in industry and academia. However, unfortunately, there have been few investigations concerning the blends of biodegradable P34HB and sustainable PPC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%