2011
DOI: 10.1080/15614263.2010.497656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring perceptions of police use of force

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to examine issues in measuring perceptions of police useof-force incidents. The Force Factor developed by Alpert and Dunham in 1997 is assessed as an objective, use-of-force measure by comparing it to several previously used measures of the perceived legitimacy of force used by officers in arrest situations. Findings indicate that few predictor variables are consistently related to the various measures of perceptions of the legitimacy of a single use-of-force incident. While the Fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most consistent finding in the US criminological literature is that minority group members are more critical towards police use of force than majority group members (Arthur & Case, 1994;Barkan & Cohn, 1998;Johnson & Kuhns, 2009), with this statistical effect remaining even after controlling for socio-demographics such as income, education and employment (Jefferis, Butcher, & Hanley, 2011). According to Jefferis et al (2011) such negative attitudes are probably due to negative experiences between citizens and the police in minority communities, as well as experiences reported through the media.…”
Section: Public Consent Towards Police Violencementioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most consistent finding in the US criminological literature is that minority group members are more critical towards police use of force than majority group members (Arthur & Case, 1994;Barkan & Cohn, 1998;Johnson & Kuhns, 2009), with this statistical effect remaining even after controlling for socio-demographics such as income, education and employment (Jefferis, Butcher, & Hanley, 2011). According to Jefferis et al (2011) such negative attitudes are probably due to negative experiences between citizens and the police in minority communities, as well as experiences reported through the media.…”
Section: Public Consent Towards Police Violencementioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to Jefferis et al (2011) such negative attitudes are probably due to negative experiences between citizens and the police in minority communities, as well as experiences reported through the media. Johnson and Kuhns (2009) found that both the race of the respondent and the race of the offender (police officer) predicted attitudes towards police use of force.…”
Section: Public Consent Towards Police Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another potential risk for police officers is that the public may judge their behavior as unjust or ineffective (Brandl, Frank, Worden, & Bynum, 1994; Chandek, 1999; Hopkins, Hewstone, & Hantzi, 1992; Jefferis, Butcher, & Hanley, 2011; Mason et al, 2014; Reisig & Chandek, 2001; Ren, Cao, Lovrich, & Gaffney, 2005). This can put an officer’s reputation and career at risk, especially if the incident garners national attention.…”
Section: Risk-takingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to these stereotypes, a critical race approach suggests that not taking race into account hinders optimal law enforcement practices and helps us gain an understanding of why police officers view Black males as potential perpetrators and how race is related to aggressive actions against Black males (Jefferis, Butcher, & Hanley, 2011). Unfortunately, most people who have not been oppressed may find it difficult to comprehend the issues being discussed here.…”
Section: Critical Race Theory and The Policing Of Black Malesmentioning
confidence: 99%