Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)

Perenboom, R.J.M.; Chorus, A.M.J.

doi:10.1080/0963828031000137081

Cited by 316 publications

(249 citation statements)

References 9 publications

(7 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

222

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A limitation is that the ICF emphasises that in addition to measuring impairments and function, clinicians should also assess participation (Perenboom and Chorus, 2003;WHO, 2001). Most of the studies included only reported UE impairment outcome measures.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multiple sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation and upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke: A review and meta-analysis

Triccas

Burridge

Hughes

et al. 2016

Clinical Neurophysiology

108

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

h i g h l i g h t stDCS and rehabilitation had small non-significant effect on upper extremity impairments. Varied tDCS and rehabilitation programmes were identified in selected studies. Future research needs to further analyse tDCS and therapy interventions in stroke. a b s t r a c tObjective: To systematically review the methodology in particular treatment options and outcomes and the effect of multiple sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with rehabilitation programmes for upper extremity recovery post stroke. Methods: A search was conducted for randomised controlled trials involving tDCS and rehabilitation for the upper extremity in stroke. Quality of included studies was analysed using the Modified Downs and Black form. The extent of, and effect of variation in treatment parameters such as anodal, cathodal and bi-hemispheric tDCS on upper extremity outcome measures of impairment and activity were analysed using meta-analysis. Results: Nine studies (371 participants with acute, sub-acute and chronic stroke) were included. Different methodologies of tDCS and upper extremity intervention, outcome measures and timing of assessments were identified. Real tDCS combined with rehabilitation had a small non-significant effect of +0.11 (p = 0.44) and +0.24 (p = 0.11) on upper extremity impairments and activities at post-intervention respectively. Conclusion: Various tDCS methods have been used in stroke rehabilitation. The evidence so far is not statistically significant, but is suggestive of, at best, a small beneficial effect on upper extremity impairment. Significance: Future research should focus on which patients and rehabilitation programmes are likely to respond to different tDCS regimes.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multiple sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation and upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke: A review and meta-analysis

Triccas

Burridge

Hughes

et al. 2016

Clinical Neurophysiology

108

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…outlined the revision process and discussed the rationale for the ICF and the needs that it serves in rehabilitation. Also reviewed in this special issue were some unique features of this classification system, with articles by Perenboom and Chorus (2003) on the Participation measure, and Schneidert, Hurst, Miller, and Üstün (2003) on the Environmental Factor, among others.Stucki, Ewert, and Cieza (2003) provided a general discussion of the ICF's potential as a functional tool and concluded that the ICF's new language is an exciting landmark for rehabilitation, potentially leading to a stronger position for rehabilitation within the medical community, enhanced multiprofessional communication, and improved communication between patients and rehabilitation professionals. This optimistic view was echoed by Üstün, , whose overview of the development of the ICF and the needs it serves in rehabilitation led them to conclude that it is a needed and essential tool.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Contemporary Literature Overview.

Bruyère¹,

VanLooy²,

Peterson³

2005

Rehabilitation Psychology

117

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article reviews the literature from the 3 years since the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health's (ICF's) endorsement, focusing on those articles that discuss (a) what the ICF means and how it can be used; (b) the general utility of the ICF for specific fields, such as nursing, occupational therapy, speech-language pathology, and audiology; (c) examples of applications for classification in particular disorders, such as chronic health conditions, neuromusculoskeletal conditions, cognitive disorders, mental disorders, sensory disorders, and primary and secondary conditions in children; (d) uses of the ICF to recode prior work across multiple surveys and across country coding schemes on disability-related national survey items; and (e) governmental uses of the ICF in the United States and selected countries abroad. Future directions needed to effectively implement the ICF across rehabilitation policy, research, and practice are discussed.This article reviews the literature in psychology and health and human services, and rehabilitation more generally, from the 3 years since the endorsement of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). For this review, we narrowed our searches to articles focused on clinical research or specific implementations of the Bruyère , VanLooy, & Peterson The ICF: Contemporary Literature Overview ICF. Most available articles on the ICF discuss its utility for specific groups or particular research areas. The overview of current literature presented here is not exhaustive but rather illustrative of current applications of the ICF to research and practice.Our review suggests that the actual application of the ICF is as yet somewhat limited because the World Health Organization (WHO) endorsement is so recent; the earliest references using the ICF correspond with the WHO's 2001 endorsement. Standardized application of the ICF in North America has yet to be realized in anticipation of the release of the clinical implementation manual (see Reed et al., 2005); thus, it is not surprising to find limited research on clinical implementation of the ICF. From our review of the literature and of unpublished reports, it seems clear that the ICF is being used in a preliminary fashion to inform conceptual frameworks in research and for recoding data from other health classifications. Recently completed and ongoing research has undoubtedly not yet been published.In this review, we cluster articles by the following areas: (a) what the ICF means and how it can be used; (b) general utility of the ICF for specific fields, such as nursing, occupational therapy, speech-language pathology, and audiology; (c) examples of applications for classification in particular disorders, such as chronic health conditions, neuromusculoskeletal conditions, cognitive disorders, mental disorders, sensory disorders, and primary and secondary conditions in children; (d) uses of the ICF to recode prior work across multiple surveys and across country coding...

show abstract

“…Se diferentes estratégias de códigos são utilizadas, uma vez que existe uma variabilidade de apreciação dependente do contexto sociocultural, isso coloca dificuldades para a comparação de dados entre os países; assim, alguns países têm desenvolvido distinções pró-prias de atividade e de participação 22,23 .…”

Section: Alguns Dilemas Colocados Para a Incorporação Do Modelo Da Cifunclassified

A classificação internacional de funcionalidade, incapacidade e saúde da organização mundial da saúde: conceitos, usos e perspectivas

Farias

Buchalla

2005

Rev. bras. epidemiol.

291

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumoO objetivo do presente artigo é apresentar a Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde (CIF), que faz parte da "família" de classificações desenvolvida pela Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). São apresentados o histórico e o processo de revisão da classificação anteriorClassificação Internacional de Deficiências, Incapacidades e Desvantagens (CIDID)-que deram origem à atual classificação -CIF. O modelo da CIF substitui o enfoque negativo da deficiência e da incapacidade por uma perspectiva positiva, considerando as atividades que um indivíduo que apresenta alterações de função e/ou da estrutura do corpo pode desempenhar, assim como sua participação social. A funcionalidade e a incapacidade dos indivíduos são determinadas pelo contexto ambiental onde as pessoas vivem. A CIF representa uma mudança de paradigma para se pensar e trabalhar a deficiência e a incapacidade, constituindo um instrumento importante para avaliação das condições de vida e para a promoção de políticas de inclusão social. A classificação vem sendo incorporada e utilizada em diversos setores da saúde e equipes multidisciplinares. No entanto, será mais adequada à medida que for utilizada por um número maior de profissionais, em locais diversos e a partir de pessoas e realidades diferentes.Palavras-chave: Palavras-chave: Palavras-chave: Palavras-chave: Palavras-chave: Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saú-de. Organização Mundial da Saúde. Pessoas com deficiência.

show abstract

Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)

Cited by 316 publications

References 9 publications

Multiple sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation and upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke: A review and meta-analysis

Multiple sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation and upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke: A review and meta-analysis

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Contemporary Literature Overview.

A classificação internacional de funcionalidade, incapacidade e saúde da organização mundial da saúde: conceitos, usos e perspectivas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About