2016
DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1219217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Empathy in a German Youth Prison: A Validation of the German Version of the Basic Empathy Scale (BES) in a Sample of Incarcerated Juvenile Offenders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
31
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, an original 20-item version of the BES (Jolliffe and Farrington 2006) was tested, but this factor structure did not show a good fit to the data. Based on other studies that used a shorter version (e.g., Geng et al 2012;Heynen et al 2016), and on statistical analyses of the items, a 12item version of the BES was produced. Some studies suggest that the inclusion of both positively-worded items and negatively-worded items in a questionnaire decreases its psychometric properties (Suárez Álvarez et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, an original 20-item version of the BES (Jolliffe and Farrington 2006) was tested, but this factor structure did not show a good fit to the data. Based on other studies that used a shorter version (e.g., Geng et al 2012;Heynen et al 2016), and on statistical analyses of the items, a 12item version of the BES was produced. Some studies suggest that the inclusion of both positively-worded items and negatively-worded items in a questionnaire decreases its psychometric properties (Suárez Álvarez et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, a three-factor model with 20 items was described (Herrera-López et al 2017). Also, two-factor models with a reduced number of items were found to have a good fit (Geng et al 2012;Heynen et al 2016;Pechorro et al 2015;Sánchez-Pérez et al 2014). Among these studies, the strict cutoff criteria for an excellent fit (Hu and Bentler 1999) were met for a 12-item version with a two-factor structure that showed the best fit (Heynen et al 2016) and for a 16-item version with a two-factor structure (Geng et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, various instruments targeting different aspects of ASD symptoms [Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist—ATEC ( 95 ); Social Communication Questionnaire—SCQ ( 96 )] will be used for pre-, post-, and follow-up assessments. Furthermore, affective and cognitive components of empathy and emotion regulation abilities will be measured via self-reports [Emotion Regulation Questionnaire—ERQ ( 97 ); Index of Empathy for Children and Adolescents—IECA ( 98 ); Basic Empathy Scale—BES ( 99 )] and parental questionnaires [Griffith Empathy Measure—GEM ( 100 ); Emotion Regulation Checklist—ERC ( 101 )]. For subgroup stratification and the investigation of comorbid symptoms of ASD such as attention deficit, anxiety, aggression, and depression, the Diagnostic System for Mental Disorders in Childhood and Adolescence for ADHD, Depression, Anxiety, and Conduct Disorder [DISYPS III ADHS, DEP, ANG, SSV—self- and parental rating versions; ( 102 )] will be used.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding gaze behavior, longer fixation duration on the eyes and increased pupil dilation will be the outcomes on the MASC and ERT. Outcomes on participants and caregiver ratings will be a decrease in ASD symptoms measured with the ATEC ( 95 ) and SCQ ( 96 ) and an increase in empathy and emotion regulation abilities measured with the ERQ ( 97 ), IECA ( 98 ), BES ( 99 ), GEM ( 100 ), and ERC ( 101 ). Neurophysiological activity will be measured at baseline and after the intervention using resting-state EEG and fMRI to measure changes in functional connectivity and electrical activity in the brain.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%