2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1298917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Access to Justice: The Quality of Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fairness in the outcome of the process, also called distributive justice, is important for the victim and impacts victim satisfaction (Elliott et al, 2011;Laxminarayan and Pemberton, 2012). For a victim, the outcomes of the process are manifested through corrective, retributive, formal, informational, and restorative justice (Carr, 1981;Verdonschot et al, 2008). Corrective justice reverses the harm and losses suffered by the victim (Weinrib, 2000).…”
Section: Victim Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fairness in the outcome of the process, also called distributive justice, is important for the victim and impacts victim satisfaction (Elliott et al, 2011;Laxminarayan and Pemberton, 2012). For a victim, the outcomes of the process are manifested through corrective, retributive, formal, informational, and restorative justice (Carr, 1981;Verdonschot et al, 2008). Corrective justice reverses the harm and losses suffered by the victim (Weinrib, 2000).…”
Section: Victim Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formal justice ensures equality before the law, which leads to comparable fairness across different cases. Though informational justice is mainly related to the quality of the procedure, information is important for victims to know the reason for a particular outcome (Bies and Shapiro, 1987;Verdonschot et al, 2008;Wenzel, 2006). Lack of transparency and information may result in victim doubting the integrity of the process.…”
Section: Victim Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is differing conceptual mapping of procedure quality (Verdonschot et al, 2008), but broadly, procedure quality is determined by procedural justice (Leventhal, 1980; Lind and Tyler, 1988) and interactional justice (Bies and Moag, 1986; Bies and Shapiro, 1987; Colquitt, 2001). Procedural justice is mainly determined by the degree of fairness in procedures adopted by the regulatory system (Leventhal, 1980).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As to the contents of objective criteria, research on fairness and distributive justice has delivered many useful insights that can be turned into best practices (Konow 2003). Seven theoretical approaches to outcome justice can be distinguished: distributive justice, restorative justice, corrective justice, retributive justice, transformative justice, legal pragmatism, and formal justice (Verdonschot, Barendrecht et al 2008). Justice research has made quite some progress to establish which type of criteria disputants find appropriate in different settings.…”
Section: Share: Information About Fair Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%