2017
DOI: 10.1177/0269758017727344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mediating influence of crime type on victim satisfaction with police services

Abstract: Different crimes have their own unique characteristics. Victim needs and experiences vary across crime types. However, there has been a tendency for the criminal justice system to treat victims as a homogeneous entity and respond to victims of different types of crimes in a routine manner. This is especially true in a developing country like India. This study, using victim survey data from India, examines whether the crime type (property crime or violent crime) has a mediating influence on the relation between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 79 publications
(97 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the findings of this study, reassurance call-backs to victims of volume crime can influence victim satisfaction; however, it is also clear that the nature and magnitude of the effect differs depending on crime type. This supports Kumar's (2018) argument that the type of reported crime may have a direct influence on the levels of satisfaction experienced by victims. To an extent, victims of cycle theft felt greater satisfaction when they received a follow-up call.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Based on the findings of this study, reassurance call-backs to victims of volume crime can influence victim satisfaction; however, it is also clear that the nature and magnitude of the effect differs depending on crime type. This supports Kumar's (2018) argument that the type of reported crime may have a direct influence on the levels of satisfaction experienced by victims. To an extent, victims of cycle theft felt greater satisfaction when they received a follow-up call.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%