Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs 2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-386915-9.00004-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measures of Anger and Hostility in Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The self-report questionnaire is divided in eight sub-factors: assault (10 items), irritability (11 items), indirect hostility (nine items), resentment (eight items), negativism (five items), guilt (nine items), suspicion (10 items), and verbal hostility (13 items). In addition to subscale scores, the factors can be summed to provide a total score 21. The Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory has demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha between 0.72 and 0.79), test-retest reliability (stability coefficients between .64 and .82), and convergent validity (correlation coefficients between 0.40 and 0.70 for measurements of aggression/hostility/anger) 21…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The self-report questionnaire is divided in eight sub-factors: assault (10 items), irritability (11 items), indirect hostility (nine items), resentment (eight items), negativism (five items), guilt (nine items), suspicion (10 items), and verbal hostility (13 items). In addition to subscale scores, the factors can be summed to provide a total score 21. The Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory has demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha between 0.72 and 0.79), test-retest reliability (stability coefficients between .64 and .82), and convergent validity (correlation coefficients between 0.40 and 0.70 for measurements of aggression/hostility/anger) 21…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to subscale scores, the factors can be summed to provide a total score 21. The Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory has demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha between 0.72 and 0.79), test-retest reliability (stability coefficients between .64 and .82), and convergent validity (correlation coefficients between 0.40 and 0.70 for measurements of aggression/hostility/anger) 21…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the clinical context, a number of newer instruments also draw attention to a variety of facets of anger experience and expression that are not captured by the STAXI (cf. review by Fernandez et al, 2015). The Anger Disorders Scale, for example, permits a number of dysfunctional anger profiles to be identified, but is rarely used in evaluation research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure although widely used, was not fully supported by factor analytic studies and has also been criticized regarding their used practice and theoretical clarity. In addition, it received criticism regarding the response scale employed, which was the true-false, that are known only results and what motivated the construction of the Hostility-Guilt Inventory of Buss and Durkee (Fernandez & Gregory, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%