2004
DOI: 10.1063/1.1738523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of optical losses in mid-infrared semiconductor lasers using Fabry–Pérot transmission oscillations

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inLoss mechanisms of quantum cascade lasers operating close to optical phonon frequencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From these values of G M and the threshold current density J th we can obtain an estimate of the waveguide loss coefficient, α w . From the relationship J th =(α w + α M ) / G M , where α M = -ln(R)/L is the mirror loss and R~0.3 is the facet reflectivity, we obtain α w ≈ 12 ± 2 cm -1 , consistent with typical values of α w ≈ 10 cm -1 obtained for similar ridges using a Fabry Perot resonance technique [7]. Similar measurements of the e3-34 amplification peak from the λ ~10.0 µm sample produced values for the gain coefficient and waveguide loss of G M = 28 ± 3 cm/kA and α w ≈ 18 ± 2 cm -1 respectively ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…From these values of G M and the threshold current density J th we can obtain an estimate of the waveguide loss coefficient, α w . From the relationship J th =(α w + α M ) / G M , where α M = -ln(R)/L is the mirror loss and R~0.3 is the facet reflectivity, we obtain α w ≈ 12 ± 2 cm -1 , consistent with typical values of α w ≈ 10 cm -1 obtained for similar ridges using a Fabry Perot resonance technique [7]. Similar measurements of the e3-34 amplification peak from the λ ~10.0 µm sample produced values for the gain coefficient and waveguide loss of G M = 28 ± 3 cm/kA and α w ≈ 18 ± 2 cm -1 respectively ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The most common method to measure the optical losses of a QCL is based on the analysis of the Fabry-Pérot ͑FP͒ fringe contrast. 4,5 This method relies on the detection of the changes of the transmitted intensity of either an external optical source or internal. The latter is the well known Hakki-Paoli technique, which has been already exploited to measure the gain of QC lasers.…”
Section: Measurement Of Gain and Losses Of A Midinfrared Quantum Cascmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in the losses on the telecom mode to be increased, and they have been experimentally evaluated to be ∼13 cm −1 through transmission measurements. 23 As the InGaAs band gap will be smaller in energy than the first interband transitions of the quantum wells, the pump and the generated sideband will be significantly absorbed in the InGaAs cladding layers. Further, these layers do not contribute to the second-order nonlinear process due the lack of an asymmetry in the potential profile.…”
Section: ■ Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both MIR and telecom modes are guided in the AR owing to the low InP index, the telecom mode has an overlap with the InGaAs cladding layers owing to the larger telecom refractive index than that in the AR. This results in the losses on the telecom mode to be increased, and they have been experimentally evaluated to be ∼13 cm –1 through transmission measurements . As the InGaAs band gap will be smaller in energy than the first interband transitions of the quantum wells, the pump and the generated sideband will be significantly absorbed in the InGaAs cladding layers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%