2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0273-1177(01)00405-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of cosmic dust and micro-debris in GEO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dust detectors have played an important role in spacecraft payloads since at least the Pioneer 8 mission, probing in situ not only mineral dust but also ice grains . Later ‘active’ detectors produce information about the grains' compositions and, therefore, provide insights into the compositions of the sources from which the grains were emitted .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dust detectors have played an important role in spacecraft payloads since at least the Pioneer 8 mission, probing in situ not only mineral dust but also ice grains . Later ‘active’ detectors produce information about the grains' compositions and, therefore, provide insights into the compositions of the sources from which the grains were emitted .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time resolution of an optical sensor depends on its re-scan frequency, but will be quite low compared with other techniques. Also, the impact crater morphology is (Drolshagen et al, 2001). Those impacts, however, are probably from GTO or other GEO-crossing debris which have higher impact speed.…”
Section: Sensor Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike LEO, however, the GEO debris environment is not well characterized. Ground-based GEO optical measurements in general have been limited to objects greater than about 15 cm, and the only in situ measurement, GORID (e.g., Drolshagen et al, 2001), has not been able to provide debris data (e.g., size, velocity) useful to the modeling community. Ongoing GEO debris studies (Jarvis et al, 2002;Schildknecht et al, 2001) has identified substantial numbers of unknown objects, some with diameters less than 70 cm, indicating the possibility of unknown historical breakups or non-fragmentation sources in the GEO region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While on-orbit remote sensors have the potential of detecting non-catalogued objects, the millimetre and sub-millimetre realms were only effectively studied with in-situ impact detection techniques (ESA, 2022b). A small number of sensors (passive or active) and surfaces (Oikonomidou et al, 2021;ESA, 2022b) has already provided snapshots of the small population in certain orbital regimes and periods of time, with the DEBIE (Kuitunen et al, 2001;Menicucci et al, 2013) and the GORID (Drolshagen et al, 2001) impact detectors being two characteristic detector examples in LEO and GEO, respectively. While measurements from returned surfaces have already found their way in the validation chain of the small object population of the MASTER model, observations from active insitu detectors have yet to be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%