1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(96)00057-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of aerosol fluxes to speulder forest using a micrometeorological technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

16
145
2
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
16
145
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…review by Gallagher et al, 1997) tending to larger values than predicted by theoretical models (Slinn, 1982) and observed during wind tunnel studies (Chamberlain, 1966). In addition, particles frequently show apparent upward fluxes (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…review by Gallagher et al, 1997) tending to larger values than predicted by theoretical models (Slinn, 1982) and observed during wind tunnel studies (Chamberlain, 1966). In addition, particles frequently show apparent upward fluxes (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In addition, particles frequently show apparent upward fluxes (cf. review by Gallagher et al, 1997). Whilst emissions of super-micron particles have been attributed to wind-driven resuspension (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in regions with high atmospheric concentrations of ammonium salts (nitrates and sulphates) the deposition of nutrients to forest canopies as fine particulates cannot be ignored. For example, a deposition velocity of 1 cm s -1 , which is typical for fine particulate deposition to forests (Gallagher et al, 1997), and an air concentration of around 6 μg N m -3 as measured in parts of China (Aas et al, 2007, Wang et al, 2006 would give an annual N deposition greater than 15 kg ha -1 , close to the Critical Load for forests used in Europe (Hettelingh et al, 1995) before any consideration of other atmospheric sources of N deposition, such as wet deposition or dry deposition of N-containing gases.…”
Section: Secondary Aerosol Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In connection with this, local deposition velocity is defined as a flux normalized with concentration and with an opposite sign. The dry deposition velocity of aerosol particles with sizes 0.1 -30 lam was parameterized with particle size [Gallagher et al, 1997], friction velocity [Duan et al, 1988], and/or stability parameter [Fontan et al, 1997]. Gallagher et al, [1997] presented a summary of deposition velocity models to forest canopies including theoretical estimates on known removal processes like Brownian diffusion, interception, and impaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%