1983
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1983.tb22184.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Variation and Significance in Serologic Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second discordant pair of results was in the titers of a syphilis test (TPPA) obtained manually, being twice positive but with titers of 1/2'560 initially and 1/10'240 when redone. The clinical impact was considered significant in this 2 nd case since a high titer of 1/10'240 generally reflects an acute infection and since this difference of two dilutions might be considered as clinically relevant [40,41]. The limited number of discrepant results did not allow to investigate the effect of the time delays between the management of the original samples and their replicates.…”
Section: Results Serologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The second discordant pair of results was in the titers of a syphilis test (TPPA) obtained manually, being twice positive but with titers of 1/2'560 initially and 1/10'240 when redone. The clinical impact was considered significant in this 2 nd case since a high titer of 1/10'240 generally reflects an acute infection and since this difference of two dilutions might be considered as clinically relevant [40,41]. The limited number of discrepant results did not allow to investigate the effect of the time delays between the management of the original samples and their replicates.…”
Section: Results Serologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The sensitivity and specificity, as well as the confidence intervals (CI) and Youden index were calculated according to Thrusfield (2005). The concordance between the results was calculated using the kappa coefficient (Taylor, 1992) and the results interpreted according to Pereira (2002). The calculations were performed using the EpiR package of statistical software R.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative sensitivity and specificity were evaluated as suggested by Coggon et al [5]. In order to assess the level of agreement between dot-ELISA and commercial ELISA Kit tests, the index of concordance, Kappa (κ), was used [20,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%