Internal quality assurance in diagnostic microbiology: A simple approach for insightful data

Abstract

Given the importance of microbiology results on patient care, high quality standards are expected. Internal quality assurance (IQA) could mitigate the limitations of internal quality control, competency assessment and external quality assurance, adding a longitudinal insight, including pre- and post-analytical steps. Here, we implemented an IQA program in our clinical microbiology facilities with blind resubmission of routine samples during 22 months. One-hundred-and-twenty-one out of 123 (98.4%) serological analyses and 112 out of 122 (91.8%) molecular analyses were concordant. Among the discordances in molecular biology analyses, 6 results were low positive samples that turned out negative, likely due to stochastic repartition of nucleic acids. Moreover, one identified retranscription error led us to implement automated results transmission from the Applied Biosystems instruments to the laboratory information system (LIS). Regarding Gram stain microscopy, 560 out of 745 (75.2%) of compared parameters were concordant. As many as 67 out of 84 (79.8%) pairs of culture results were similar, including 16 sterile pairs, 27 having identical identification or description and semi-quantification and 24 only showing variations in semi-quantification with identical description or identification of colonies. Seventeen pairs had diverging identification or description of colonies. Culture was twice only done for one member of the pairs. Regarding antibiotic susceptibility testing, a major discrepancy was observed in 5 out of 48 results (10.4%). In conclusion, serological tests were highly reproducible. Molecular diagnosis also revealed to be robust except when the amounts of nucleic acids present in the sample were close to the limits of detection. Conventional microbiology was less robust with major discrepancies reaching 39.5% of the samples for microscopy. Similarly, culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing were prone to discrepancies. This work was ground for reconsidering multiples aspects of our practices and demonstrates the importance of IQA to complete the other quality management procedures.

Validation of a Standard Protocol to Assess the Fermentative and Chemical Properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Wine Strains

“…The first kind of variability (inter-laboratory) was studied and assessed through the trials in synthetic must. Inter-laboratory variability is caused by several factors, including laboratory personnel, metrics, reliability of tools, and equipment ( Scherz et al, 2017 ), which could be due to systematic bias; however, there is also a casual source of errors, which must be characterized and weighted because it is responsible of the uncertainty of the measure ( UNODC, 2009 ). The causal error cannot be completely avoided, but it should be within acceptable limit because results from different laboratories should not be significantly different when using the same conditions and the same setup.…”

Implementation of Automated Blood Culture With Quality Assurance in a Resource-Limited Setting

“…Differences affected several antibiotic classes. An internal quality control study in Switzerland found that even in highresource settings 14% of samples were not accurately retested in the same microbiological laboratory and 3% of tested antibiotics were interpreted differently (25). By the time of the study, internal quality controls including sterility tests were in place, but commercially available quality control strains were not established.…”

Computer-aided medical microbiology monitoring tool: a strategy to adapt to the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic and that highlights RT-PCR consistency

“…Repeated testing on identical samples is a recognized method for internal quality assurance, which can lead to the identification of systematic or sporadic vulnerabilities in microbiology laboratories (27). In the present quality monitoring, different samples from the same patient were compared, similarly to the “Delta check” routinely applied in clinical chemistry laboratories.…”