2014
DOI: 10.18044/medinform.201412.70
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the Maximum Bite Force in the Natural Dentition with a Gnathodynamometer

Abstract: The aim of the present study is to measure the maximum bite force (MBF) in the natural dentition with the help of a force-measurement device -gnathodynamometer, designed and constructed specially for the purpose of the study. Materials and methods: 80 students from FDM-Sofia, aged between 20 and 32, were tested. Each student was given instructions about the study and its method, and the tests were carried out thereafter. The tip of the force-measuring tensometric module of the gnathodynamometer was first place… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the results of our study, mean fracture load values for all tested groups were within the range of the maximum chewing forces reported in literature in the posterior area (850N) [28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Regarding the results of our study, mean fracture load values for all tested groups were within the range of the maximum chewing forces reported in literature in the posterior area (850N) [28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The mean unilateral bite force in the premolar area is 70% lower than the molar region, with an average of 210-420 N [42]. In another study [51], the mean value of the maximum bite force is around 353 N in men, while in women it is 218 N. In one study [50] discussing the effect of clenching intensity on the biting force in the premolar region, the results showed values from 450 to 660 N. According to our results, these designs cannot be used in case of clenching and bruxism. Occlusal forces rarely reach 45 N during normal chewing, equivalent to the mean of molar bite force [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The mean unilateral bite force in the premolar area is 70% lower than that in the molar region, with an average of 210-420 N [40,41]. In another study [19], it was reported that the mean maximum bite force was approximately 353 N in males; meanwhile, it was 218 N in females. The occlusal forces rarely reach 45 N during normal chewing, equivalent to the mean of molar bite force [42], so the specimens evaluated in this study were dynamically loaded at 50 N [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Before the clinical application of any new type of prosthetic restoration or material, its mechanical performance must be determined and evaluated in preclinical tests. If the fracture resistance of the restoration exceeds the expected maximum bite force, typically approximately 500 N in the posterior region [18,19], no damage is expected in clinical use [20]. Compared to other dental ceramics, extremely high fracture resistance and favorable fatigue behavior have been determined for FDPs made from zirconia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%