1981
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90352-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of the fraction of myosin heads bound to actin in rabbit skeletal myofibrils in rigor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5a). In this condition-i.e., in the absence of nucleotideessentially all cross-bridges are attached to the actin filament with very high affinity (31,32), meaning that a stiffness increase in rigor can not be attributed to an increased number of strongly attached myosin heads. Instead, the increase in stiffness of the fibers carrying the mutation in the converter domain must rather be caused by a higher stiffness-i.e., a larger resistance to elastic distortion-of the cross-bridges with the Arg719Trp mutation.…”
Section: Fiber Cross-sectional Area and Packing Of Myofibrils Studied Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5a). In this condition-i.e., in the absence of nucleotideessentially all cross-bridges are attached to the actin filament with very high affinity (31,32), meaning that a stiffness increase in rigor can not be attributed to an increased number of strongly attached myosin heads. Instead, the increase in stiffness of the fibers carrying the mutation in the converter domain must rather be caused by a higher stiffness-i.e., a larger resistance to elastic distortion-of the cross-bridges with the Arg719Trp mutation.…”
Section: Fiber Cross-sectional Area and Packing Of Myofibrils Studied Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the small fraction of heads with rigor-like orientation is responsible for this high stiffness, they must have much higher stiffness than in rigor (10). However, ifwe assume that the fraction of rigor stiffness (75-85%) is the fraction of attached heads, then at most 17% (13%/75%) of the attached heads exhibit rigor-like orientation, since all the heads are bound in rigor (22,23). This upper bound could increase to 34% if all attached cross-bridges are single-headed in active muscle, since single-headed cross-bridges have been shown to be as stiff as double-headed cross-bridges under some conditions (9,10).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was therefore important to investigate the question of possible crossbridge heterogeneity by an alternative experimental technique. In this paper we present an examination of this problem by the tryptic digestion method, introduced to study the association of crossbridges with actin in myofibrils by Lovell & Harrington (1981) and first applied to study the effect of ATP and its analogues on actin-myosin interaction by Reisler and his collaborators (Chen & Reisler, 1983. It relies on the fact that in rigor myosin heads are attacked during mild tryptic treatment at a single prote~ise-sensitive site removed at 26 kDa from the N-terminal end of the myosin heavy chain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%