Abstract:To study the orientation of spin-labeled myosin heads in the first few seconds after the production of saturating ATP, we have used a laser flash to photolyze caged ATP during EPR data acquisition. Rabbit psoas muscle fibers were labeled with maleinide spin label, modifying 60% of the myosin heads without impairing muscle fiber biochemical and physiological activity (ATPase and force). The muscle bundles were incubated for 30 min with 5 mM caged ATP prior to the UV flash. The flash, from an excimer laser, libe… Show more
“…However, other in vitro studies reported an angle close to that in rigor (Zot et al, 1990). The EPR studies that showed rotational motion of heads during contraction (Cooke et al, 1982;Barnett & Thomas, 1989;Fajer et al, 1990) are also consistent with our results.…”
Section: Angles Of the Crossbridgessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…X-ray diffraction (Huxley & Brown, 1967;Yagi et al, 1981;Huxley et al, 1982) and EPR studies (Cooke et al, 1982;Barnett & Thomas, 1989;Fajer et al, 1990) have suggested that the averaged structure of contracting muscle is different from that of rigor or relaxed muscle. The results of X-ray diffraction were interpreted to mean that during contraction the helical arrangement of myosin heads along thick filaments is disordered but the --, 14.3 nm subunit repeat is maintained.…”
Structural changes of crossbridges during isometric contraction have been studied by electron microscopy. Chemically skinned rabbit fibres were rapidly frozen either in activating solution or in ATP-free (rigor) solution, freeze-substituted and embedded. Longitudinal sections of muscle fibres show that the number of crossbridges in active fibres (isometric contraction) is approximately the same as in rigor fibres. Crossbridges of the active and rigor states differ in their shapes, angles and manner of arrangement on the thin filaments. In rigor many crossbridges are wide near the thin filaments and narrow near the thick filament shafts; in active fibres they have more uniform width along their length. The angle of the crossbridges in active fibres is somewhat variable. The average angle is approximately 90 degrees to the filament axis. The crossbridges are arranged on the thin filament retaining the 14.3 nm thick filament periodicity. The crossbridges in rigor are tilted and their arrangement near the thin filament reveals the 36 nm actin periodicity. The variability in the shapes of the crossbridges in active fibres is still higher when we look at them in cross-sections of muscle fibres. The crossbridge shapes in the cross-sections were classified and the relative frequency of different shapes was determined. The shapes that are commonly observed in active fibres are similar in that the majority of the mass of the crossbridges is farther away from the thin filament than the crossbridges in rigor fibres.
“…However, other in vitro studies reported an angle close to that in rigor (Zot et al, 1990). The EPR studies that showed rotational motion of heads during contraction (Cooke et al, 1982;Barnett & Thomas, 1989;Fajer et al, 1990) are also consistent with our results.…”
Section: Angles Of the Crossbridgessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…X-ray diffraction (Huxley & Brown, 1967;Yagi et al, 1981;Huxley et al, 1982) and EPR studies (Cooke et al, 1982;Barnett & Thomas, 1989;Fajer et al, 1990) have suggested that the averaged structure of contracting muscle is different from that of rigor or relaxed muscle. The results of X-ray diffraction were interpreted to mean that during contraction the helical arrangement of myosin heads along thick filaments is disordered but the --, 14.3 nm subunit repeat is maintained.…”
Structural changes of crossbridges during isometric contraction have been studied by electron microscopy. Chemically skinned rabbit fibres were rapidly frozen either in activating solution or in ATP-free (rigor) solution, freeze-substituted and embedded. Longitudinal sections of muscle fibres show that the number of crossbridges in active fibres (isometric contraction) is approximately the same as in rigor fibres. Crossbridges of the active and rigor states differ in their shapes, angles and manner of arrangement on the thin filaments. In rigor many crossbridges are wide near the thin filaments and narrow near the thick filament shafts; in active fibres they have more uniform width along their length. The angle of the crossbridges in active fibres is somewhat variable. The average angle is approximately 90 degrees to the filament axis. The crossbridges are arranged on the thin filament retaining the 14.3 nm thick filament periodicity. The crossbridges in rigor are tilted and their arrangement near the thin filament reveals the 36 nm actin periodicity. The variability in the shapes of the crossbridges in active fibres is still higher when we look at them in cross-sections of muscle fibres. The crossbridge shapes in the cross-sections were classified and the relative frequency of different shapes was determined. The shapes that are commonly observed in active fibres are similar in that the majority of the mass of the crossbridges is farther away from the thin filament than the crossbridges in rigor fibres.
“…(4, 55–59) In the S state, myosin heads form stereospecific contacts with actin, while in the W state the catalytic and light-chain domains of the myosin head show rotational disorder on the microsecond time scale. (4, 24, 55, 58, 60–64) TPA studies with probes on actin have shown that actin also has two predominant structural states, S and W (more dynamically disordered), related to the structural states of the interacting myosin head. (2, 6, 7)…”
We have used time-resolved phosphorescence anisotropy (TPA) to investigate the effects of essential light chain (ELC) isoforms (A1 and A2) on the interaction of skeletal muscle myosin with actin, in order to relate structural dynamics to previously reported functional effects. Actin was labeled with a phosphorescent probe at C374, and the myosin head (S1) was separated into isoenzymes S1A1 and S1A2 by ion-exchange chromatography. As previously reported, S1A1 exhibited substantially lower ATPase activity at saturating actin but substantially higher apparent actin affinity, resulting in higher catalytic efficiency. In the absence of ATP, each isoenzyme increased actin’s final anisotropy cooperatively and to a similar extent, indicating similar restriction of the amplitude of intrafilament rotational motions in the strong-binding (S) state of actomyosin. In contrast, in the presence of saturating ATP, S1A1 increased actin anisotropy much more than S1A2 and with greater cooperativity, indicating that S1A1 was more effective in restricting actin dynamics during the active interaction of actin and myosin. We conclude that during the active interaction of actin and ATP with myosin, S1A1 is more effective at stabilizing the S state (probably the force-generating state) of actomyosin, while S1A2 tends to stabilize the weak-binding (non-force-generating) W state. When a mixture of isoenzymes is present, S1A1 is dominant in its effects on actin dynamics. We conclude that ELC of skeletal muscle myosin modulates strong-to-weak structural transitions during the actomyosin ATPase cycle in an isoform-dependent manner, with significant implications for the contractile function of actomyosin.
“…Alternatively, it is possible that the S 1-induced changes in the above studies do not reflect conformational changes in actin but reflect local rotations ofthe probes or their immediate environments (Fajer et al, 1990b). To investigate these possibilities more thoroughly, (a) spin labels should be attached to other sites on actin (e.g., the myosin binding site) or (b) caged ATP studies (Ostap and Thomas, 1991;Fajer et al, 1990c) should be done on oriented actin samples.…”
Previous studies on spin-labeled F-actin (MSL-actin), using saturation transfer electron paramagnetic resonance (ST-EPR), have demonstrated that actin has submillisecond rotational flexibility and that this flexibility is affected by the binding of myosin and its subfragments. This rotational flexibility does not change during the active interaction of myosin heads, actin, and adenosine triphosphate. However, these ST-EPR studies, performed on randomly oriented actin, would not be sensitive to orientational changes on the millisecond time scale or slower. In the present study, we have clarified these results by performing conventional EPR experiments on MSL-actin oriented by flow to detect changes in the orientational distribution. We have determined the orientational distribution of the spin labels relative to the magnetic field (flow direction) by comparing experimental EPR spectra to simulated EPR spectra corresponding to known orientational distributions. Spectra acquired during flow indicate two populations of probes: a highly ordered population and a disordered population. For the ordered population (28% of the total spin concentration), the angle between the actin filament axis and the nitroxide z axis (theta) fits a Gaussian distribution centered at 32.0 +/- 0.9 degrees, with a full width at half maximum of 20.7 +/- 3.9 degrees. The angle between the nitroxide x axis and the projection of the field in the xy plane (phi) is centered at 37.5 +/- 9.2 degrees with a full width of 24.9 +/- 10.7 degrees. This orientational distribution is not significantly changed upon the binding of phalloidin or myosin subfragment 1 (S1), indicating that these proteins do not affect the axial orientation of actin subunits. Spectra of spin-labeled S1 (MSL-S1) bound to actin oriented by flow have about the same orientational distribution as MSL-S1 bound to actin in oriented fibers. Thus, the oriented fraction of flow-oriented actin filaments has nearly the same high degree of alignment as the actin filaments in muscle fibers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.