1996
DOI: 10.1116/1.589083
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of interfacial shear (friction) with an ultrahigh vacuum atomic force microscope

Abstract: Carpick, Robert W.; Agraït, N.; Ogletree, D. F.; and Salmeron, Miguel, "Measurement of interfacial shear (friction) with an ultrahigh vacuum atomic force microscope" (1996). Departmental Papers (MEAM). 97. http://repository.upenn.edu/meam_papers/97Measurement of interfacial shear (friction) with an ultrahigh vacuum atomic force microscope AbstractWe have studied the variation of frictional force with externally applied load for a Pt-coated atomic force microscope tip in contact with the surface of mica cleaved… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
154
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 321 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
154
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The particular model utilized, such as the Hertz 9 or Johnson-Kendall-Roberts 10 model, depends upon the strength and range of the tipsample interaction forces 11 ͑among other things͒, which is uncertain in each case. The contact area-load relation for a single asperity also depends upon the tip shape, as demonstrated experimentally by Carpick et al 6 Furthermore, if the shear strength is not independent of load ͑pressure͒, then the load dependence of shear strength and contact area become convoluted. 4 As well, the models used neglect the effect of lateral forces upon the contact area, yet this may indeed be a significant effect 12,13 to explore.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The particular model utilized, such as the Hertz 9 or Johnson-Kendall-Roberts 10 model, depends upon the strength and range of the tipsample interaction forces 11 ͑among other things͒, which is uncertain in each case. The contact area-load relation for a single asperity also depends upon the tip shape, as demonstrated experimentally by Carpick et al 6 Furthermore, if the shear strength is not independent of load ͑pressure͒, then the load dependence of shear strength and contact area become convoluted. 4 As well, the models used neglect the effect of lateral forces upon the contact area, yet this may indeed be a significant effect 12,13 to explore.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…3 -triangles͒ using a standard technique described elsewhere. 3,6,22 To see how varies with load, Eqs. ͑1͒, ͑3͒, and ͑4͒ are combined to give…”
Section: ͑5͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[1][2][3][4] One can thus detect the onset of surface damage-inelastic deformation-with atomic-scale precision. [5][6][7][8] Previous experiments with well characterized surfaces carried out in ultrahigh vacuum ͑UHV͒ have shown that the relation between friction force and contact area can be described by the Derjaguin-Müller-Toporov 3,9 ͑DMT͒ or the Johnson-Kendall-Roberts ͑JKR͒ model, 10,11 depending on the adhesion energy and on the hardness of the contacting materials. These two models have been developed as approximations for the elastic behavior in two opposite extremes, one for soft and adhesive materials, and the other for hard and poorly adhesive ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%