2012
DOI: 10.1002/hed.22007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of epithelial thickness within the oral cavity using optical coherence tomography

Abstract: Our data serve as reference values for detecting oral malignancy and determining the approximate grade of dysplasia. In this circumstance, a differentiated view of the different regions is important due to a variation in thickness of the epithelium within the oral cavity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thickness of the regenerating epithelium in group 1 was measured to be approximately 285 mm. A study was done by Prestin et al 13 to measure the thickness of human buccal epithelium by optical coherence tomography. According to their study, the thickness of human buccal epithelium was 294 mm, which suggests that rat and human buccal epithelium thickness are comparable to each other and that future studies performed on rat buccal mucosa will be of value to researchers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of the regenerating epithelium in group 1 was measured to be approximately 285 mm. A study was done by Prestin et al 13 to measure the thickness of human buccal epithelium by optical coherence tomography. According to their study, the thickness of human buccal epithelium was 294 mm, which suggests that rat and human buccal epithelium thickness are comparable to each other and that future studies performed on rat buccal mucosa will be of value to researchers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The epithelium in oral mucosa is generally 90 to 300-μm thick. 40 Therefore, a 1.5-mm OCT imaging depth remains capable of imaging the entire epithelium, basement membrane, and into the lamina propria, sufficient for initial assessment of submucosal involvement. The HRF imaging component described here was designed for use with the contrast agent proflavine because of its ability to rapidly stain cell nuclei and, therefore, allow assessment of nuclear morphology, which is a well-established marker of dysplasia and neoplasia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physiologically, the oral mucosa tissue is generally composed of multiple cell layers; however, for computational speed, the current model assumed six hypothetical sublayers to calculate drug diffusion across the epithelium and lamina propria. Moreover, the thickness fraction (expressed as a percentage) for each sublayer was [27,28] b Surface areas for individual compartments in human adults were obtained from literature [29,30], the surface areas for children can be estimated by scaling adult surface areas based on published information on vocal tract development [31] c Values for epithelium thickness in different regions in humans were obtained from literature [12,22,[32][33][34][35][36][37] d Very limited information for lamina propria thickness is available for humans [32] e pH values in individual regions of the oral cavity for human were found in literature [38] defined by fitting in vitro permeability data in porcine buccal and sublingual tissues. From optimal fitting of the results of intraoral permeability assays for nine model molecules, sublayer 1 represents 5% of the total epithelium thickness, and the remaining 95% of epithelium thickness is split evenly among the remaining five layers.…”
Section: Model Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%