2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scoms.2016.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement invariance in comparative Internet use research

Abstract: Comparative studies in communication and Internet research call for equivalent measures of key constructs that are comparable across populations. This article details and applies the concept of measurement invariance within a cross-nationally comparative context. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis is used to test configural, metric, and scalar invariance in an empirical example and structural equation modeling introduces exogenous predictors of Internet use types. Results support metric invariance for a … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurement invariance (equivalence) concerns whether scores from the operationalization of a construct have the same meaning under different conditions (Kline, 2016). Compared to the most commonly used multi‐group confirmatory factor analysis, which focuses on measurement model across samples, MGSEM additionally incorporates structural modeling (Büchi, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Measurement invariance (equivalence) concerns whether scores from the operationalization of a construct have the same meaning under different conditions (Kline, 2016). Compared to the most commonly used multi‐group confirmatory factor analysis, which focuses on measurement model across samples, MGSEM additionally incorporates structural modeling (Büchi, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study is concerned with whether motivational factors, as a latent factor, are measured by the same constructs of creativity motivation, creative confidence, and creative growth‐mindset across different country groups. Configural invariance is imperative here because it allows the exploration of the basic structure of the measurement model cross‐nationality (Büchi, 2016). If the measurement models are ensured to have similar patterns across groups, the next restriction level is metric invariance .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some types of comparative analyses and benchmark research on digital inequalities would certainly benefit from a single skill score (Dolni car, Prevodnik, and Vehovar 2014). However, calculating a single summative score would be possible only if the short version of the ISS were found to be a valid second-order construct (Brown 2015). Therefore: RQ4: Does the short version of the ISS measure internet skills as a second-order construct?…”
Section: Rq3: Does the Short Version Of The Iss Demonstrate Measurement Equivalence Between Younger And Older Internet Users?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the first-order CFA showed adequate construct validity of the ISS, while indicating the viability of a measurement model with four first-level factors and one second-level factor because of the pattern of correlations (h matrix) among the four first-order factors (Table 5). To answer RQ4, a CFA second-order measurement model of the ISS was specified (see Figure 1) and analyzed, using a three-stage approach devised by Brown (2015).…”
Section: Confirmatory Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But even in this project which was designed with a comparative goal from the outset, meaningful conclusions can only be drawn after careful tests of measurement invariance (see Büchi, 2016). And the same applies to comparative research based on content analyses; here similar tests of measurement equivalence can be conducted (Wirth and Kolb, 2012).…”
Section: Avoiding Measurement Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%