2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2005.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markets versus negotiations: An experimental investigation

Abstract: We consider the consequences of competition between two types of experimental exchange mechanisms, a "decentralized bargaining" market, and a "centralized" market. The experiment demonstrates that decentralized bargaining is subject to a process of unraveling in which relatively weak traders (buyers with high willingness to pay and sellers with low costs) continuously Þnd trading in the centralized market more attractive until almost no opportunities for mutually beneÞcial trade remain outside the centralized … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypothesis testing using the Wilcoxon signrank test is applied to determine whether the percentage differential between the two sales mechanisms is statistically significant. 16 We find that the percentage differentials are statistically significant in all cases except when they are analyzed according to location in a down market. Table 6 about here…”
Section: The High F-values Indicate That All the Independent Variablementioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hypothesis testing using the Wilcoxon signrank test is applied to determine whether the percentage differential between the two sales mechanisms is statistically significant. 16 We find that the percentage differentials are statistically significant in all cases except when they are analyzed according to location in a down market. Table 6 about here…”
Section: The High F-values Indicate That All the Independent Variablementioning
confidence: 68%
“…They also find that frozen fish sold through auction obtain the highest sales price, although auction sales also exhibit larger monthly variation in prices. Kulger, Neeman, and Vulkan (2006) find that a centralized market is more advantageous to "high-value" traders of homogeneous goods. In their study, "high-value traders" are buyers who have a high willingness to pay and sellers who have low reservation prices.…”
Section: Other Considerations In the Choice Of Sales Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also find that frozen fish sold through auction obtain the highest sales price, although auction sales also exhibit larger monthly variation in prices. Kulger, Neeman and Vulkan () find that a centralized market is more advantageous to “high‐value” traders of homogeneous goods. In their study, “high‐value traders” are buyers who have a high willingness to pay and sellers who have low reservation prices.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their different research questions these papers do not allow for institutions with systematic price biases. Kugler et al (2006) investigate the case of centralised versus decentralised trading institutions. All of these papers rely on the assumption of rational traders and do not allow for learning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%