2009
DOI: 10.5589/m08-080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping vegetated wetlands of Alaska using L-band radar satellite imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
86
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
86
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the original [26] classification in Alaska and subsequent work demonstrated that the technique was capable of providing highly accurate (∼90%) maps of wetland type and represented a significant improvement over existing mapping in the area, the approach had a number of limitations that needed to be addressed. One major problem was that the method necessitated breaking the mosaic into sixteen tiles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the original [26] classification in Alaska and subsequent work demonstrated that the technique was capable of providing highly accurate (∼90%) maps of wetland type and represented a significant improvement over existing mapping in the area, the approach had a number of limitations that needed to be addressed. One major problem was that the method necessitated breaking the mosaic into sixteen tiles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particular advantage of random forests over other machine learning algorithms, such as support vector machines (SVM), is that it only requires a small number of tuning parameters [25] and is computationally efficient. Random forests was applied by Whitcomb et al [26] to data from the Japanese Earth Resources Satellite (JERS-1) and ancillary layers to derive a map of wetlands in Alaska and was found to produce maps with a higher accuracy than applying unsupervised (ISODATA) and supervised (maximum likelihood) algorithms. Following from the successful application of random forests to map wetlands from JERS-1 data and ancillary data [26], subsequent studies focused on applying the same method to data from the Phased-Array L-band SAR (PALSAR) carried onboard the Advanced Land Orbiting Satellite (ALOS) [27] and expanding the technique to also include wetlands in Canada [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wetland types (1-km resolution) were listed by Whitcomb et al [19] as combinations of estuarine (tidal inlet), lacustrine (lakes), or palustrine (bogs and fens) with scrub/shrub, emergent, or moss/lichen vegetation cover. Permafrost types for Alaska were mapped originally by Ferrians [23] and regridded to 8-km spatial resolution for this analysis.…”
Section: Methods and Data Sets Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vegetation cover classes from 2009 MODIS imagery (1-km resolution; Friedl et al 2002 [22]) and the wetland map developed from satellite radar by Whitcomb et al [19] were added to the EVI trend analysis (Figure 2). Wetland types (1-km resolution) were listed by Whitcomb et al [19] as combinations of estuarine (tidal inlet), lacustrine (lakes), or palustrine (bogs and fens) with scrub/shrub, emergent, or moss/lichen vegetation cover.…”
Section: Methods and Data Sets Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation