1992
DOI: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.1992.tb00351.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the Nomological Network of Career Self‐Efficacy

Abstract: This article examined the degree to which personality hardiness (control, commitment, and challenge), career beliefs (status, preference, motivation, and flexibility), self-efficacy (general and social), and occupational choice status related to career self-efficacy among a sample of 181 college juniors and seniors. Results from an intercorrelation matrix and regression analysis indicated that motivation, self-efficacy, occupational choice status, and commitment correlated significantly to career self-efficacy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(25 reference statements)
2
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher scores on Taylor and Betz's CDMSE scale were found to be significantly related to greater exploratory behavior, and were a much stronger predictor of career exploration than age, gender, or goal-directedness. Niles and Sowa (1992) found career beliefs, personality hardiness, and general self-efficacy to be predictive of the CDMSE scores of college students. And Fukuyama, Probert, Neimeyer, Nevill, and Metzler (1988) examined the impact of a computerized, self-directed career-guidance program on CDMSE.…”
Section: Self-efficacy and Career Decision-making Processesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Higher scores on Taylor and Betz's CDMSE scale were found to be significantly related to greater exploratory behavior, and were a much stronger predictor of career exploration than age, gender, or goal-directedness. Niles and Sowa (1992) found career beliefs, personality hardiness, and general self-efficacy to be predictive of the CDMSE scores of college students. And Fukuyama, Probert, Neimeyer, Nevill, and Metzler (1988) examined the impact of a computerized, self-directed career-guidance program on CDMSE.…”
Section: Self-efficacy and Career Decision-making Processesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…When selecting articles for inclusion in this review, I noticed two themes that could be used to group articles in this section: (a) issues of self-esteem and self-concept and (b) personal and vocational identity. Some interesting articles dealing with self-efficacy, a relatively new construct proposed by Bandura (1 9771, are recommended to readers but, because of space limitations, will not be discussed here (Gist & Mitchell, 1992;Niles & Sowa, 1992). Betz (1992) did an excellent job-in a short article-of reviewing the basic components of self-effcacy theory and showing applications to women's career choices.…”
Section: Stage #1: Gaining An Understanding Of Selfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the career self-efficacy research found that such individuals possess the ability to find new opportunities for career grooming. It can predict many beginning career behaviors such as continuous job searching (Niles & Sowa, 1992) which relates to careerism. The above discussion provides justification of selecting career self -efficacy as a mediator in the relationship of proactive personality and careerism.…”
Section: Global Social Sciences Review (Gssr)mentioning
confidence: 99%