2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping key process parameters to the performance of a continuous dry powder blender in a continuous direct compression system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the increasing interest in continuous manufacturing for pharmaceutical dosage forms, continuous blending of powders is also gaining attention ( Bhalode and Ierapetritou, 2020 ; Gao et al, 2013 ; Pernenkil and Cooney, 2006 ). Most studies on continuous powder blending so far have been focused on varying process parameters and the resulting effects on blending performance ( Gao et al, 2011 ; Järvinen et al, 2013 ; Palmer et al, 2020 ; Roth et al, 2017 ; Van Snick et al, 2017 ; Vanarase and Muzzio, 2011 ). Furthermore, theoretical modeling and simulation of continuous powder blending has been a topic of increased interest in recent years ( Galbraith et al, 2018 ; Gyürkés et al, 2020 ; Toson et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increasing interest in continuous manufacturing for pharmaceutical dosage forms, continuous blending of powders is also gaining attention ( Bhalode and Ierapetritou, 2020 ; Gao et al, 2013 ; Pernenkil and Cooney, 2006 ). Most studies on continuous powder blending so far have been focused on varying process parameters and the resulting effects on blending performance ( Gao et al, 2011 ; Järvinen et al, 2013 ; Palmer et al, 2020 ; Roth et al, 2017 ; Van Snick et al, 2017 ; Vanarase and Muzzio, 2011 ). Furthermore, theoretical modeling and simulation of continuous powder blending has been a topic of increased interest in recent years ( Galbraith et al, 2018 ; Gyürkés et al, 2020 ; Toson et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the feeding rate of one ingredient varies from the set point for even a short period of time, or if there is a spike in material due to accumulation in any part of the system, the resulting variability in concentration could produce out of specification material downstream (Weinekötter and Reh, 1995). Blenders are incorporated in the continuous manufacturing line and can offset some degree of feed variability (Palmer et al, 2020), but when the process shifts from acceptable ranges it results in material rejection via the control system, impacting the overall yield or causing the continuous process to stop for correction. Many studies of LIW feeders have not sufficiently evaluated the impact of feeder refills to the overall feasibility of feeding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the method in [31], the API concentration in the blended powder was determined using an inline SentroPAT FO NIR (near-infra-red) spectrometer with InGaAs photodiode array detector in the 1100-2200 nm range equipped with a diffuse reflectance fiber optic probe (Sentronic GmbH). The NIR calibration consisted of 337 samples spanning approximately 80-150% of the target API concentration, with minimized correlation between any two components.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%