1986
DOI: 10.1559/152304086783900068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping Continuous Geographical Distributions Using Dot-Density Shading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we present a graduated symbol map in which data are classified into different classes that are then correlated with a given size of the symbol. Dot‐density map : Dot‐density or density point map uses dots or points placed on a map. Each dot represents a specific number of epidemiological events (Lavin, ). Unlike the graduated symbol maps, all points are of the same size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we present a graduated symbol map in which data are classified into different classes that are then correlated with a given size of the symbol. Dot‐density map : Dot‐density or density point map uses dots or points placed on a map. Each dot represents a specific number of epidemiological events (Lavin, ). Unlike the graduated symbol maps, all points are of the same size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dot-density map: Dot-density or density point map uses dots or points placed on a map. Each dot represents a specific number of epidemiological events (Lavin, 1986). Unlike the graduated symbol maps, all points are of the same size.…”
Section: Choropleth Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, some charts use grids of dots to convey proportions [61], and some variants of Euler diagrams exist that decompose areas into discrete sets of unit objects [61]. An alternative approach, used for example in dot density maps [51], consists of encoding values with dot density instead of dot cardinality. Although variants of all these visualizations exist that use icons or symbols instead of dots [25,35], the primary encoding relies on dot cardinality or density, while dot appearance is secondary.…”
Section: Dot-based Visualizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it should be pointed out that these arguments, and the research conducted to support them, focused exclusively on traditional paper maps. Elsewhere in cartography, it was recognised early that adding interactivity to maps could help us move beyond the single-optimal-map paradigm (Lavin, 1986;MacEachren and Ganter 1990) and that interactivity can help to solve some of the long-standing problems with map reading (Dykes and Unwin, 1998;Peterson, 1999).…”
Section: New Technology Changes Old Argumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%