Mapeamento do Tema Gestão do Apoio à Decisão Quando Analisado sob a Ótica de seus Resultados

Abstract

The changes caused by the new competitive mood has implied people and in particular, the executives to make severer decisions. Regarding this situation, a new discipline called Decision Support has emerged. This fact increased the motivation of academics and practitioners to study and improving the Decision Support Management. To start a new research is important take into account what have been done, who researches, who publishes, and the main expressions to define this subject. In this context, this research proposes to find out informations about the theme Decision Support Management under the view of results according the manager's perceptions. Regarding this purpose, the 2 first steps of the process ProKnow-C (Knowledge Development Process -Constructivist) will be carry out. At the end, 12 highlight articles aligned with this theme and the researcher's perceptions were identified. Regarding this Bibliographic Portfolio and their references, the main journals, papers, authors and keywords were highlighted allowing the researcher knows what have been done about it, and who publishes and what are the most related words about the theme.

Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysis

“…The intervention instrument used was the process to build knowledge based on the interests and delimitations of the researchers, according to the constructivist view, called Knowledge Development Process-Constructivist (ProKnow-C), as shown in the work of Bortoluzzi et al (2011) and it was carried out in three stages: (i) selection of the literature (bibliographic portfolio) with scientific recognition aligned to the researchers' view on the subject and its delimitations; (ii) bibliometric analysis of selected articles and their respective references; (iii) systemic analysis using the lens approach, methodologies, and indicators. Therefore, it allows researchers to construct the necessary knowledge-base and, secondly, to look for gaps in the literature to contribute scientifically to the theme (Bortoluzzi et al, 2011;Chaves et al, 2012;Ensslin et al, 2013).…”

“…And then, the systemic analysis was carried out, characterized by the critical analysis of the bibliographic portfolio from the lenses detailed in Chart 2: approach, singularity, identity process, measurement, integration, and management. As a result of the systemic analysis, the methodologies of the quality tools and multicriteria methods are detailed, as well as the indicators used to measure the object of study of the portfolio articles (Lacerda et al, 2012;Chaves et al, 2012).…”

Technology Roadmapping: Uma Análise Bibliométrica

“…O método adotado para atingir esses objetivos é o processo denominado ProKnow-C (Knowledge Development Process -Constructivist), cuja finalidade é de propiciar um melhor entendimento sobre uma determinada temática (CHAVES et al, 2012). Para a consecução de seus objetivos, este artigo se apresenta em cinco seções: a presente seção introdutória, o referencial teórico na segunda seção, Revista Mundi Engenharia, Tecnologias e Gestão.…”

Avaliação De Desempenho Na Gestão Da Produção: Análise Bibliométrica E Sistêmica Da Literatura Internacional

“…Conforme mencionado, para a formação de um portfólio bibliográfico capaz de fornecer condições para a análise sistêmica, utilizar-se-á o método de intervenção Proknow-C, motivo este, por se tratar de uma metodologia consistente e responsável pela obtenção dos resultados de várias pesquisas já publicadas em periódicos, tais como: TASCA et al, 2010;BORTOLUZZI et al, 2011a;BORTOLUZZI et al, 2011b;AFONSO et al, 2012;BACK et al, 2012;CHAVES et al, 2012;ENSSLIN et al, 2012;LACERDA et al, 2012;VILELA, 2012;DIENSTMANN et al, 2014. A metodologia Proknow-C, consiste em três macros etapas: (i) seleção de um portfólio bibliográfico, (ii) análise bibliométrica, (iii) análise sistêmica (ENSSLIN et al, 2010).…”