2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manipulating texture and cohesion in academic writing: A keystroke logging study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the clausal level, scientific phenomena are construed dynamically, represented as implicational or expectant outcomes that can be cyclical, culminative, or unending, and related to other fields of activity in terms of interdependency relations such as extending, enhancing, or elaborating [26]. Adding to this complexity is the fact that combining these meanings into cohesive, coherent texts in writing calls upon a number of highly developed mechanisms [27]. Hence, to master scientific knowledge, EMI students need to be able to both understand and manipulate intricate epistemological constellations of meaning [28]-and do so in a language that is not their L1.…”
Section: The Language Of Emi Science Classroomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the clausal level, scientific phenomena are construed dynamically, represented as implicational or expectant outcomes that can be cyclical, culminative, or unending, and related to other fields of activity in terms of interdependency relations such as extending, enhancing, or elaborating [26]. Adding to this complexity is the fact that combining these meanings into cohesive, coherent texts in writing calls upon a number of highly developed mechanisms [27]. Hence, to master scientific knowledge, EMI students need to be able to both understand and manipulate intricate epistemological constellations of meaning [28]-and do so in a language that is not their L1.…”
Section: The Language Of Emi Science Classroomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essays analysed in these studies were written on computers without access to the Internet. Bowen and Thomas (2020) investigated in real time how L1 and L2 students developed clauses, added information, and used lexis to refer backward and forward across the paragraphs. The participants were three L1 and three L2 students (Chinese) at a British university, the latter scoring intermediate points on the International English Language Testing System.…”
Section: Cohesion-building In the Writing Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outer context of the text is the context of culture, while the inner one is the context of the situation. Moreover, the relationship between text and context, as explained by (Bowen & Thomas, 2020;Butt et al, 2012;Halliday et al, 2014), context is decide whether to render the translation as an equivalent expression, paraphrase, or as literal equivalent (Heriwati, 2018;Sjørup, 2011).…”
Section: Target Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%