1989
DOI: 10.1080/00913367.1989.10673149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manipulating Message Involvement in Advertising Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
4

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
67
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence that attention focus is a quality of situational involvement can be drawn from the literature on message involvement, a motivational state induced by a particular advertising stimulus or situation (Laczniak, Muehling, & Grossbart, 1989). Attention has been equated with such a situationally motivated state (Wright, 1973), or viewed as one of its dimensions (Laczniak et al, 1989).…”
Section: Flow and Situational Involvement Require Focused Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence that attention focus is a quality of situational involvement can be drawn from the literature on message involvement, a motivational state induced by a particular advertising stimulus or situation (Laczniak, Muehling, & Grossbart, 1989). Attention has been equated with such a situationally motivated state (Wright, 1973), or viewed as one of its dimensions (Laczniak et al, 1989).…”
Section: Flow and Situational Involvement Require Focused Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Situational involvement is more routinely experimentally manipulated than measured (see Laczniak et al, 1989, for a review). A common thread of the manipulations is to make the situation, for example, advertising, product class, or purchase decision, personally relevant, to increase the likelihood that the individual will be personally affected, and hence motivated, to respond to the situation.…”
Section: Situational Involvement Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Andrews, Durvasula, and Akhter (1990), the "involvement direction" refers to the target of the involvement, such as an advertisement (i.e., Laczniak, Muehling, & Grossbart, 1989;Wright, 1973;Zaichkowsky, 1985Zaichkowsky, , 1994 or a product (i.e., Bloch, 1984;Lastovicka & Gardner, 1989;Zaichkowsky, 1985Zaichkowsky, , 1994. Researchers have also examined responses to an advertisement or product in online environments (Cho, 1999;Cho & Leckenby, 1999;Hershberger, 2003;McMillan, Hwang, & Lee, 2003;Yang et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Having no consensus, many researchers define involvement as the extent to which a stimulus or task is relevant to the consumer's existing needs and values [61][62][63]. After reviewing past conceptualizations in advertising research, Laczniak, Muehling and Grossbart [64] suggested two components of involvement in advertising. As consumers become more involved they should (1) pay more attention to the ad message, and (2) focus more on brand processing as opposed to non-brand processing.…”
Section: Construct Reference Key Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%