1991
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1991.01870220049009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mandibular Reconstruction With a Recombinant Bone-Inducing Factor: Functional, Histologic, and Biomechanical Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
113
0
6

Year Published

1993
1993
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 343 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
113
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study provide evidence of the safety and technical feasibility of TEB for maxillary sinus floor augmentation and vertical ridge augmentation in agreement with those from earlier animal studies that have indicated that treatment with TEB dose not result in toxicity, significant immunologic reactions, or other serious adverse effects [20][21][22][23] .…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The results of this study provide evidence of the safety and technical feasibility of TEB for maxillary sinus floor augmentation and vertical ridge augmentation in agreement with those from earlier animal studies that have indicated that treatment with TEB dose not result in toxicity, significant immunologic reactions, or other serious adverse effects [20][21][22][23] .…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Among graft materials currently available for clinical use, autogeneous cancellous bone is the most effective in stimulating bone healing response. However, autografting requires additional surgical procedures resulting in increased morbidity and operative time [4,11,22], and in some cases, the quantity of bone available for harvest is insufficient. Vascularized autografts need special techniques for microvascular tissue transfer [11,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although various bone graft techniques have been established [18][19][20], there are disadvantages to each such as additional surgical invasion and limited bone source in autograft, immunomediated rejection and transmission of infectious agents in allograft or xenografts, and technical difficulty in vascularized grafts. Recently, therefore much interest has been focused on the application of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) as a bone graft substitute in reconstructive orthopedic surgery [4,5,9,11,15,22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations