Managing Tropical Forest Ecosystem Services: An Overview of Options

Börner, Jan; Vosti, Stephen A.

doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5176-7_2

Cited by 33 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 69 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Different contextual institutional factors, such as clearly defined property rights, inclusive multilevel governance structures for collective action and institutional and organizational management capacities, will affect the implementation of REDD+ (Börner & Vosti 2013). If these contextual factors are not sufficiently taken into account when implementing a particular REDD+ architecture, PAMs face the risk of being ineffective.…”

Section: Risks To Redd+ Implementationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risks to REDD+: potential pitfalls for policy design and implementation

Loft

Pham²,

Wong

et al. 2016

Envir. Conserv.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYInternational negotiations for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and the enhancement of forest carbon stocks (REDD+) under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) were finally concluded in 2015. However, due to the complex design and implementation processes of REDD+ policies and measures, including benefit sharing at national and subnational levels, several challenges exist for sustainably reducing emissions while simultaneously managing the provision of social and environmental side-objectives. We review the realities of REDD+ implementation in 13 REDD+ candidate countries and the risks related to REDD+ policies and benefit sharing based upon a synthesis of the findings presented in 'country profiles' that were developed between 2009 and 2013 as part of the Center for International Forestry Research's (CIFOR) Global Comparative Study on REDD+. We find that REDD+ policies in all countries studied are at high risk of ineffectiveness, inequity and inefficiency. By classifying these risks and understanding not only their impacts on different stakeholder groups, but also the consequences for achieving specific objectives, countries can identify solutions in order to address these shortcomings in their implementation of REDD+.

show abstract

Section: Risks To Redd+ Implementationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risks to REDD+: potential pitfalls for policy design and implementation

Loft

Pham²,

Wong

et al. 2016

Envir. Conserv.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The size, type and timing of benefits distributed through performance-based mechanisms in the natural resource sector, such as PES, influence the outcomes in terms of land-use change Börner and Vosti 2013). In this regard, PES programs can offer valuable lessons for REDD+ benefit sharing.…”

Section: Motivation For Participation In Redd+mentioning

confidence: 99%

Lessons from Payments for Ecosystem Services for REDD+ Benefit-Sharing Mechanisms

Loft¹,

Pham²,

Luttrell³

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Mức độ, hình thức và thời gian phân bổ các các lợi ích thông quan các cơ chế dựa trên hiệu năng trong lĩnh vực quản lý tài nguyên thiên nhiên, ví dụ như trong PES, ảnh hưởng lên các kết quả về mặt thay đổi sử dụng đất Börner & Vosti 2013). Xét về mặt này, các chương trình PES có thể đưa ra các bài học bổ ích cho chia sẻ lợi ích REDD+.…”

Section: Thúc đẩY Sự Tham Gia Trong Redd+unclassified