Managing the Lifecycle of Open Innovation Platforms

Hallerstede, Stefan

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-02508-3

Cited by 25 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The literature recognizes two overlapping streams in the ield of open innovation [13]. The focus of the irst stream, represented by Henry Chesbrough, is based on chances and opportunities such as: the acquisition of external experts and intellectual property rights, the achievement of strategic advantages, as well as many other ways to overcome the problems arising from the "not invented here" syndrome.…”

Section: Defining Open Innovation Platformsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In recent decades, this form of contest has become an integral part of modern business. One of the early examples of this kind of business was organized by the Fredkin Prize for Computer Chess 1997, which awarded a $100,000 prize to the one who makes a computer program that would be able to defeat Gary Kasparov -chess grandmaster at the time [3] [13].…”

Section: Innovation Contestsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, communities can implement the characteristics of an innovation competition by setting challenges within the community. In that case, the challenge carries a smaller reward or even no reward, so as not to disturb the spirit of cooperation among community members [13].…”

Section: Innovation Communitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The innovation market place ensures generating innovation by combining existing knowledge or approach (innovators) with new areas of application (organizer challenges). A single project, within the innovation market, can be seen as an innovation contest [13].…”

Section: Innovation Market Placementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The Application Of Online Platforms In Open Innovation

R¹,

Stosic²,

Štavljanin³

2018

JITA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:It is well known that innovation has been recognized as a crucial success factor for companies. The development of information technologies enabled integration of innovators (suppliers, customers, institutes) into innovation process by the use of IT-based tools. This facilitated the access to a large pool of ideas that can grow into innovation as new product/service, process.The connection of open innovation concept and information systems resulted in platforms for open innovation that enabled easier access, not only to customers, but also to other potential participants, who are willing to independently contribute in solving the speci ic problems of the company. Having in mind the importance of this contemporary approach, the main goal of the paper is the systematization of platforms for open innovation. Moreover, we presented platform classi ication, key elements of existed platforms design, as well as various examples of best practice of platforms for open innovation with recognized design elements.

show abstract

Section: Defining Open Innovation Platformsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Innovation Contestsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Innovation Communitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Innovation Market Placementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Application Of Online Platforms In Open Innovation

R¹,

Stosic²,

Štavljanin³

2018

JITA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Based on the mode of operation of those involved and the type of innovation, literature uses different terms to refer to the process of knowledge intermediation, among which highlights: innovation intermediaries (Howells, 2006;Klerkx and Bishop 2009), innovation intermediary organizations (Tura et al, 2011;Dutrénit et al, 2012), open innovation intermediaries (Alexander and Martin, 2013;Hallerstede, 2013), innovation intermediaries in open collaboration or crowdsourcing (Silva and Ramos, 2011;Billington and Davidson 2013), base or grassroots intermediaries (Hargreaves et al, 2013), collateral organizations -boundary organizations (Cash, 2001) or simply intermediaries (Peng et al, 2014). base o grassroots (Hargreaves et al, 2013), organizaciones colaterales -boundary organizations- (Cash, 2001) o simplemente intermediarios (Peng et al, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modelos de intermediación en la extensión agrícola

Medel

Díaz-José

Hernández-Hernández

et al. 2018

Remexca

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumenEl servicio de extensión agrícola es uno de los principales vínculos entre la producción y el uso del conocimiento para la agricultura de los países en desarrollo. En la literatura, se han identificado agentes que actúan como intermediarios para vincular a dos o más actores que no se encuentran conectados. Sin embargo, pocos estudios abordan los mecanismos que éstos utilizan para intervenir y menos aún, una tipología que los caracterice e integre. Aplicando el concepto de intermediarios de la innovación, el propósito de este artículo fue develar los mecanismos que utiliza el extensionismo agrícola para articular la oferta y demanda de conocimiento e innovación. Para ello, se analizaron cuatro estudios de caso que emplearon diferentes estrategias de extensión. Los resultados indican que una caracterización de intermediarios se realiza por el nivel de participación en la toma de decisiones de los agricultores, la estrategia que utiliza el intermediario para orquestar el proceso de gestión de innovación, el contexto del sistema de producción en que se interviene y si el intermediario se orienta hacia la oferta, demanda o juega un papel neutral en ese proceso. A partir de ello, los intermediarios se clasificaron como gestores, mediadores, moderadores e implementadores, concluyendo que cada uno de ellos requiere recursos, soporte y evaluación de resultados de forma diferenciada en los procesos de extensión.Palabras clave: extensión agrícola, intermediarios de la innovación, orquestación de redes. AbstractAgricultural extension service is one of the main links between production and use of knowledge for agriculture in developing countries. In literature, have been identified agents that act as intermediaries to link two or more players who are not connected. However, few studies address the mechanisms that this uses to intervene and even less, a typology that characterizes and integrates them. Applying the concept of innovation intermediaries, the purpose of this article was to unravel the mechanisms used by agricultural extension to articulate offer and demand for knowledge and innovation. For this, four case studies that used different extension strategies were analyzed. The results indicate that a characterization of intermediates is performed by the level of participation in decisionmaking of farmers, the strategy that intermediaries use to orchestrate the process of managing innovation, the production system context in which intervene and if the intermediary is oriented toward offer, demand or play a neutral role in this process. From this, intermediaries were classified as managers, mediators, facilitators and implementers, concluding that each of them require resources, support and evaluation of results separately in the process of extension.Keywords: agricultural extension, innovation intermediaries, network orchestration. IntroducciónEl extensionismo agrícola con recursos públicos sigue siendo la principal fuente de información tecnológica e innovación para los pequeños agricultores de los países en d...

show abstract