Managing risks through ISO 31000: A critical analysis

Lalonde, Carole; Boiral, Olivier

doi:10.1057/rm.2012.9

Cited by 101 publications

(65 citation statements)

References 121 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The literature expresses the need to predict important medium-long term issues to allow effective preventative action (FAO 2016b;Kleboth et al 2016). In response, research publications (Lalonde and Boiral 2012;Aven 2016;Kleboth et al 2016;Marvin et al 2016;Spink et al 2016b), government and regulatory guidance (FAO 2016b;PAS 96 2014;SSAFE 2015;FSA 2016;NSF International 2014;TiFSiP 2016;USP 2014) and international standards (e.g. BRC and COSO) provide guidance on the steps to eliminate these opportunities.…”

Section: Practicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The seafood supply chain from a fraudulent perspective

Mitchell²,

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Food fraud is an intentional act for economic gain. It poses a risk to food integrity, the economy, public health and consumers' ethics. Seafood is one commodity which has endured extensive fraudulent activity owing to its increasing consumer demand, resource limitations, high value and complex supply chains. It is essential that these fraudulent opportunities are revealed, the risk is evaluated and countermeasures for mitigation are assigned. This can be achieved through mapping of the seafood supply chains and identifying the vulnerability analysis critical control points (VACCP), which can be exposed, infiltrated and exploited for fraudulent activity. This research systematically maps the seafood supply chain for three key commodities: finfish, shellfish and crustaceans in the United Kingdom. Each chain is comprised of multiple stakeholders across numerous countries producing a diverse range of products distributed globally. For each supply chain the prospect of fraud, with reference to species substitution, fishery substitution, illegal, unreported and unregulated substitution, species adulteration, chain of custody abuse, catch method fraud, undeclared product extension, modern day slavery and animal welfare, has been identified and evaluated. This mapping of the fraudulent opportunities within the supply chains provides a foundation to rank known and emerging risks and to develop a proactive mitigation plan which assigns control measures and responsibility where vulnerabilities exist. Further intelligence gathering and management of VACCPs of the seafood supply chains may deter currently unknown or unexposed fraudulent opportunities.

show abstract

Section: Practicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The seafood supply chain from a fraudulent perspective

Mitchell²,

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Controls are then the outcomes of risk treatment decisions, in which the purpose is to modify risk. [49].…”

Section: Twenty-first Centurymentioning

confidence: 99%

An Ontological and Semantic Foundation for Safety and Security Science

Blokland¹,

Reniers²

2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When discussing the concepts of risk, safety, and security, people have an intuitive understanding of what these concepts mean, and, to a certain level, this understanding is universal. However, when delving into the real meaning of these concepts, one is likely to fall into semantic debates and ontological discussions. In industrial parks, it is important that (risk) managers from dierent companies, belonging to one and the same park, have the same understanding of the concepts of risk, safety, and security. It is even important that all companies in all industrial parks share a common understanding regarding these issues. As such, this paper explores the similarities and dierences behind the perceptions of these concepts, to come to a fundamental understanding of risk, safety, and security, proposing a semantic and ontological ground for safety and security science, based on an etymological and etiological study of the concepts of risk and safety. The foundation has been induced by the semantics used in the ISO 31000 risk management guidance standard. Hence, this article proposes a coherent, standardized set of concepts and definitions with a focus on the notion “objectives” that can be used as an ontological foundation for safety and security science, linking “objectives” with the concepts of safety, security, risk, performance and also failure and success, theoretically allowing for an increasingly more precise understanding and measurement of (un)safety across the whole range of individuals, sectors and organizations, or even society as a whole.

show abstract

“…RM offers numerous advantages, but RM malpractices might complicate the implementation of RM (Corvellec 2009;Lalonde & Boiral 2012). Hence, identifying these factors would ensure that barriers to RM implementation could be overcome through a number of appropriate measures, such as awareness and training programs.…”

Section: Factors Influencing Risk Management Practicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Risk Management Practices in Information Systems Project in the Public Sector

Baharuddin

Yusof

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Risk has been identified as one of the important factors that influences the success of Information Systems projects. Poor risk management could pose a threat to project performance and outcome. Many risk management models and standards have been developed to assist project managers and teams to overcome or minimize the impact of project risk. Despite continuous attention and emphasis on the positive contributions of risk management to a project, risk management practices are relatively lacking and it have not been practiced in its entirety. Hence, this study intended to identify the level of risk management practice and its influencing factors in IS projects. A case study was carried out by adopting the risk management maturity model to evaluate the level of risk management practices in IS projects. Factors that influence risk management practices in IS projects were identified and validated by experts. The findings can be used as a guideline for improving and enhancing implementation of risk management in project development.Keywords: Information systems project; risk management; risk management practice; risk management driver; risk management adoptions ABSTRAK Risiko telah dikenalpasti sebagai satu daripada faktor penting yang memberi kesan kepada kejayaan projek sistem maklumat. Pengurusan risiko yang lemah boleh mengancam kualiti sistem yang dibangunkan dan meningkatkan kos projek yang menyebabkan kegagalan mencapai objektif projek. Pelbagai piawaian pengurusan risiko telah dibangunkan untuk membantu mengatasi dan mengurangkan impak risiko kepada projek. Meskipun perhatian dan penekanan yang berterusan diberi terhadap sumbangan positif pengurusan risiko dalam sesebuah projek, amalan pengurusan risiko masih rendah dan tidak dilaksanakan dengan sepenuhnya. Satu kajian kes dilaksanakan dengan mengadaptasi model kematangan pengurusan risiko untuk menilai tahap amalan pengurusan risiko dalam projek sistem maklumat. Faktor amalan pengurusan risiko projek sistem maklumat dikenalpasti dan dinilai oleh pakar. Penemuan ini boleh digunakan sebagai panduan untuk menambahbaik dan meningkatkan pelaksanaan pengurusan risiko dalam pembangunan projek.Kata kunci: Projek sistem maklumat; pengurusan risiko; amalan pengurusan risiko; pemandu pengurusan risiko, adaptasi pengurusan risiko Jurnal Pengurusan 53(2018) 23 -36 https://doi.

show abstract

Managing risks through ISO 31000: A critical analysis

Cited by 101 publications

References 121 publications

The seafood supply chain from a fraudulent perspective

The seafood supply chain from a fraudulent perspective

An Ontological and Semantic Foundation for Safety and Security Science

Evaluation of Risk Management Practices in Information Systems Project in the Public Sector

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About