2008
DOI: 10.5070/v423110534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing Gulls to Reduce Fecal Coliform Bacteria in a Municipal Drinking Water Source

Abstract: Large numbers of ring-billed gulls, herring gulls, and greater black-backed gulls roost each night on a municipal drinking water source in Maine and have been identified as the primary source of elevated fecal coliform bacteria levels. The lake has a resident gull population of approximately 800, while more than 3,000 gulls have been observed during seasonal migration. To alleviate this public health concern, the U.S. Department of Agriculture APHIS Wildlife Services program implemented an Integrated Wildlife … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Defining the beneficial effects on water quality from reducing HY gull beach usage is not straight-forward, because a variety of factors combine to affect bacterial counts at the beaches, such as temperatures, wind/wave/ rainfall patterns, and beach grooming techniques. Nevertheless, there is well-reported documentation that gull fecal contamination degrades water quality (Kinzelman et al 2004;Lake County Board 2004;Levesque et al 2000;Nugent et al 2008;Whitman et al 2004). Historically, the frequency of swim advisories and swim bans in Chicago begins to increase during July.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Defining the beneficial effects on water quality from reducing HY gull beach usage is not straight-forward, because a variety of factors combine to affect bacterial counts at the beaches, such as temperatures, wind/wave/ rainfall patterns, and beach grooming techniques. Nevertheless, there is well-reported documentation that gull fecal contamination degrades water quality (Kinzelman et al 2004;Lake County Board 2004;Levesque et al 2000;Nugent et al 2008;Whitman et al 2004). Historically, the frequency of swim advisories and swim bans in Chicago begins to increase during July.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elsewhere, Edge and Hill (2007) showed bird droppings were primary sources of E. coli contamination at a Lake Ontario beach, and Levesque et al (2000) documented that bacterial content of ring-billed gull droppings can contribute to microbiological contamination of recreational waters. Nugent et al (2008) described how ringbilled and other gulls contributed to increased fecal coliform levels in a municipal drinking water source. In Racine, Wisconsin gull feces were found capable of carrying human pathogens (Kinzelman et al 2008) and gulls were a significant non-point source of fecal contamination on beaches (Kinzelman et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the USFWS permits management of conflict bird species, the permitted actions can be nonlethal (such as hazing or habitat management to deter or exclude) or lethal. Although nonlethal actions are preferred, sometimes lethal take of gulls is necessary for addressing conflicts (Dolbeer et al 1993;Nugent et al 2008). It is the responsibility of the USFWS to ensure that take is within sustainable limits for bird populations and that it does not impact long-term conservation of species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Edge and Hill (2007) showed that bird droppings served as primary sources of Escherichia coli contamination. Levesque et al (2000) documented that the bacterial content of ringbilled gull droppings can contribute to microbiological contamination of recreational waters, and Nugent et al (2008) described how ring-billed and other gulls contributed to increased fecal coliform levels in a municipal drinking water source. Data collected on or near Chicago beaches indicated that gulls were the source of E. coli in ≥50% of the samples (Whitman et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%