2022
DOI: 10.21744/irjmis.v9n4.2114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management control attributes and the organizational performance

Abstract: This qualitative review is on management control attributes and organisational performance; the study tried to determine how much financial control, budget control and marketing control affect organisational performance. Theoretical foundations were established, and extant literature drew to uphold or invalidate these positions. Qualitative literature established a significant relationship between the objectives and corporate performance values. Recommendations and conclusions were drawn accordingly from the r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A systematic literature review procedure is required to adopt a systemic and reliable methodology. Most importantly, this step allows systematic reviews to be carried out clearly and transparently, ensuring repeatability and the absence of bias in this process (Ogor & Fidelia, 2022). To minimize bias, only articles related to awards were considered, and after that, the documents were filtered based on article title, abstract, and keywords.…”
Section: Prisma Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic literature review procedure is required to adopt a systemic and reliable methodology. Most importantly, this step allows systematic reviews to be carried out clearly and transparently, ensuring repeatability and the absence of bias in this process (Ogor & Fidelia, 2022). To minimize bias, only articles related to awards were considered, and after that, the documents were filtered based on article title, abstract, and keywords.…”
Section: Prisma Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%